|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 982
Liked 2,343 Times in 465 Posts
|
![]()
So George what combo do you run? If you use your logic the 350/255 hp motor rated at 280 hp should be rated at 350 hp. That would add about 700 to 800 pounds to most of those that run it. Almost every combo is capable of running 120 under. If you want to spend money and time. Barry
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,664
Likes: 1,954
Liked 10,835 Times in 2,252 Posts
|
![]()
Will any of the AA/S or AA/SA run in the 9.40's?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 54
Likes: 62
Liked 115 Times in 31 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Barry, I don't believe that you're being very accurate ( and somewhat reckless) with your comment that "almost every combo" is capable of going that far under. No matter how much time and money is spent on them.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]()
Billy....They will if the owner/driver cheats enough and can get away with it !
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 09-18-2019 at 09:28 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
$20000 heads maybe one way performance has improved.
Only going to get so much out of the heads. Be interesting to compare Ported Stocker heads to $20k massaged. Guessing 20 to 50 hp from bare Stock heads. There are other technologies that have made our cars quicker. Such as better lubricants, composition of engine materials, tighter tolerances, treatments on bearings, cams and springs and of course Lifters, rings and pistons. There are better tires, VHT coated tracks for a heck of a lot better launch. Got Converter and Transmission technology putting power down more effectively. I am sure that $20000 heads helped a lot. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 157
Liked 229 Times in 99 Posts
|
![]()
Sorry, but I just can't see how you can put 20K into a set of heads. The labor rate has to be horrendous.
__________________
Floyd Staggs 787 SST |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 173
Likes: 113
Liked 62 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 982
Liked 2,343 Times in 465 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=Dan Fahey;597875]
There are other technologies that have made our cars quicker. Such as better lubricants, composition of engine materials, tighter tolerances, treatments on bearings, cams and springs and of course Lifters, rings and pistons. There are better tires, VHT coated tracks for a heck of a lot better launch. Got Converter and Transmission technology putting power down more effectively. Dan I don't normally agree with you but this part you hit the nail on the head. And even though I've never been a big fan of the AHFS these are the reasons I would love to see it get tweaked so it reflects all the above. BP |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|