|
![]() |
#171 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: sooner state
Posts: 105
Likes: 3
Liked 64 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I can’t run .500 under......Will somebody please explain to me,as I asked in a previous post,what were the great things that happened the last time indexes were lowered?it got rid of some cars who could not run fast enough,is that supposed to be a good thing?did it stop people from running too fast and getting hp?did it make the fast cars not be the fast cars anymore?Yes,I know it is a performance based category and I’m glad it is,but just how fast do you have to go........to be World Champ.....? Victor Penrod
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#172 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 34
Liked 138 Times in 51 Posts
|
![]()
.3 here, .5 there.....That's what you call "getting nickel-&-dimed to death"! Just as you start reaching for that dollar on the ground, somebody pulls the string that's attached to it.
__________________
LOCOMOTION Racing |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#173 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 12 Posts
|
![]()
Whatever the horsepower factor is for a given STOCK Eliminator combo,the Super Stock factor should be the SAME or higher.
I will never understand how a combo like a 1997 LT1 can be rated at 358 in Stock,but it drops to 279 in Super Stock. SUPER means MORE modifications allowed.So if the Stock factor is 358,the Super Stock factor should be at least 358. That might make it tougher to run under the index for some that find it so easy. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#174 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 849
Likes: 980
Liked 2,336 Times in 464 Posts
|
![]()
I have not read on any of the posts where a Stock racer is asking for an decrease in the indexes. Now as far as the AHFS my opinion is it should at least keep up with the increased performances over the last 15 years. BP
Last edited by B Parker; 12-08-2019 at 12:20 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Elysburg, Pa
Posts: 733
Likes: 360
Liked 327 Times in 121 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Paul Precht; 12-07-2019 at 01:24 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#176 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 1,084
Liked 184 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Stock is just a Camshaft away from the upper classes. Want to get back to Stock. NHRA will have to Reinstate the Blueprint cam rule..! Hell for reliability include Roller Lifter and Rockers. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Div. 6, Eastern, WA
Posts: 710
Likes: 2,673
Liked 240 Times in 112 Posts
|
![]()
Not over all. But for my particular combo I probably will be asking but I want to get everything out of it before I do. And I have a lot to try.
__________________
Dave Noll, EF/S ,?/SA 6526 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#178 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: lyndon ky. ... louisville area
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 29
Liked 477 Times in 117 Posts
|
![]()
So Dan Fahey ... and I agree...
do you think the cam / lifter / spring / rocker manufacturers are gonna let that happen 😂😂 >>> really it would cut 50% off cost of motor if we went back to duration & spring rules ... think about it all the other stuff not worth the 💰💰💰 if those rules remained 😡
__________________
Jack McCarthy 3609 STK "the Captain" |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#179 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 5
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
What class does a 1997 LT1 run in Stock and SS and what are the respective indexes? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#180 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sullivan, OH
Posts: 311
Likes: 827
Liked 140 Times in 46 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
SS I - K 10.70 - 11.25
__________________
Jon Sarrett Stock 3779 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|