|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 3,600
Liked 7,742 Times in 1,740 Posts
|
![]()
You hold that thought if it makes you feel better.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]()
One interesting fact is that as discussed earlier, one of the first users of intake manifold adapters in the 1970's was Ed Hamburger on his Mopar 340 and 360 Super Stock engines. The adapter allowed Ed to use a SBC intake. Therefore, since the 1970's NHRA has been allowing spacers and adapters in Super Stock class.
As a matter of fact the Ed Hamburger and Bruce Bachelder (former NHRA Tech Rep) Mopar used the adapter with the SBC intake until Offenhauser came out with the SBM Port-O-Sonic intake. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
Likes: 299
Liked 42 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 115 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
I'm gonna jump in on this one since there are UNINFORMED creatures out there. Our Heads that are in question are roughly 2-2 1/2 years old its the Gen 3 stuff. If these modifications are illegal why did it take this long for them to say this when they NHRA saw this configuration Long before Indy this year. If You so called racers think that we are .15 ahead of everyone except Zavala is all in the head design you need to quit right now because you have no work Ethic. The individuals that are the SO Called engine builders that are complaining are more interested in racing instead of being in the shop, on the Dyno or at the test sessions working with there customers instead they are promising there customers that this will work or that will work and all the customers are doing is lining their engine builders pockets. NHRA should have warned or stopped this design 2 years ago the first time they saw this JUST like the did to the HEMI design. Stop whining and get to work.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,583 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Coeymans, NY
Posts: 135
Likes: 215
Liked 128 Times in 33 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE== NHRA should have warned or stopped this design 2 years ago the first time they saw this JUST like the did to the HEMI design. .[/QUOTE]
Well said Ron, there is no substitution for hard work! But why should it have been stopped if it is legal. Or is it not really legal? This makes it sound like the rule was broken and NHRA should have said something instead of the engine builders and racers just not breaking the rule in the first place. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
It helps to go fast when you race a combination with a relative soft HP factor...just saying. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 99
Likes: 299
Liked 42 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
The only Chevy part we had was a Corvette Tach. Drive Dual Point Dist. that Ed had John Hoffman make an adapter for
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|