HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2020, 04:03 PM   #1
Stan Weiss
Senior Member
 
Stan Weiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Liked 733 Times in 384 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

I dug up some old data. This is the lifter raise for a Lunati sticker cam for a 302 Z28 from the mid '70s.Let me add that by the time I got to check the cam it was used.



Stan
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Lunati_302.gif
Views:	268
Size:	14.0 KB
ID:	56191  
Stan Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-20-2020, 04:17 PM   #2
GTS340
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Posts: 866
Likes: 269
Liked 1,340 Times in 407 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

I remember we put what was called a 7000 plus Cheater cam in a 1868 Dart GTS 340. This was around 1975. Best camshaft way back that I had was a G K that McElroy had something to do with. That was around 1980.
Had Rhodes lifters and 273 adjustable rocker arms. With some pencil neck pushrods compared to todays. Those good old days when tuning was an art and records were set.

Paul Haszlauer
GTS340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2020, 06:54 PM   #3
SSDiv6
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTS340 View Post
I remember we put what was called a 7000 plus Cheater cam in a 1868 Dart GTS 340. This was around 1975. Best camshaft way back that I had was a G K that McElroy had something to do with. That was around 1980.
Had Rhodes lifters and 273 adjustable rocker arms. With some pencil neck pushrods compared to todays. Those good old days when tuning was an art and records were set.

Paul Haszlauer
General Kinetics 041/560 grind number, the best Mopar cam grind before the rules were changed. You could balance the lifter on the lobe. It was designed by the Don Twelles, the owner of GK, one of the brightest cam designers ever and was a former Ford engineer. He designed also the cams for Grumpy Jenkins in the early days of Pro Stock.
SSDiv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2020, 07:41 PM   #4
Ralph A Powell
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Bay City Texas
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
Liked 225 Times in 136 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

And Gapp and Roush. I herd that he was working for Roush after he closed his shop.
Ralph A Powell is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 10-20-2020, 09:51 PM   #5
Mike Taylor 3601
VIP Member
 
Mike Taylor 3601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Somerset,Ky
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 350
Liked 300 Times in 102 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

I can say,I have ran under the old style rules spring pressure and lift, duration and overlap and it having to check.... and I have and do run under current rules....
I would pick current rules on cam,lifters and springs...been there done the stock pressure spring,which was checked...and duration overlap....
my IHRA pure stock combo 305/160/230 ABSOLUTELY ate springs and valves and it LOVED the taste of them... if nothing went wrong about 35-50 runs heads were coming off for valve job, valves and springs....

present rule stocker... I have one right now in D3 with 3 seasons on engine and same springs... had one with 500 runs on cam and lifters...had 300+repeatedly

I will take current rules on springs...
however if I built another stocker it would be a roller cam car... no other reason than eliminating cam break in...

Last edited by Mike Taylor 3601; 10-20-2020 at 09:55 PM.
Mike Taylor 3601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2020, 07:22 PM   #6
BLAZER
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wasthere,England
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by SSDiv6 View Post
General Kinetics 041/560 grind number, the best Mopar cam grind before the rules were changed. You could balance the lifter on the lobe. It was designed by the Don Twelles, the owner of GK, one of the brightest cam designers ever and was a former Ford engineer. He designed also the cams for Grumpy Jenkins in the early days of Pro Stock.
DON was by far ahead of Lunati-cam dynamics ect. Joe Lunati needed my cam to design a flat nose in early 70s mid 70s big block stocker chevy from GK--Don T was the guy!!!
BLAZER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2020, 01:15 PM   #7
djm670
Junior Member
 
djm670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fenton, Mi.
Posts: 92
Likes: 429
Liked 186 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTS340 View Post
I remember we put what was called a 7000 plus Cheater cam in a 1868 Dart GTS 340. This was around 1975. Best camshaft way back that I had was a G K that McElroy had something to do with. That was around 1980.
Had Rhodes lifters and 273 adjustable rocker arms. With some pencil neck pushrods compared to todays. Those good old days when tuning was an art and records were set.

Paul Haszlauer
Paul you have me laughing, you would never see 7000 rpm with one of GK's cam's ... those we came up with were low RPM with lots of torque - 6200... maybe 6400 rpm... living with stocks springs was a treat. The Chrysler specs that were turned in for the 340's and 360's were a treat to work with after working with the limited spec's on the chevrolets.
djm670 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2020, 06:12 PM   #8
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: "Old School" Stocker Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by djm670 View Post
Paul you have me laughing, you would never see 7000 rpm with one of GK's cam's ... those we came up with were low RPM with lots of torque - 6200... maybe 6400 rpm... living with stocks springs was a treat. The Chrysler specs that were turned in for the 340's and 360's were a treat to work with after working with the limited spec's on the chevrolets.
I shifted my ‘56 Chevy “Jr Stocker @7500. About the same at the finish line. The factory springs, on the seat at Stock specs (79 lbs) were weak open. I discovered PAC (?) springs, still needed new springs each race. The cam looked like a roller cam, with those nearly square lobes. Red Anderson shook his head at cam check time during tear downs. Not difficult to change the springs with the heads on the engine. TRW springs, out of the box, checked much better than GM springs. The better springs may have been Comp or Lunati. I can’t remember names well since I got so old. I apologize for that.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.