|
![]() |
#21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rainy Washington
Posts: 609
Likes: 12
Liked 223 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]()
Ok finally got to look at both data loggers samples, The fast system sample is .05 seconds and my tach samples at .01 seconds. I know i can export my fast system to excel, i will check to see if i can export my tachfact software to excel also and the overlay a same run to see what is looks like. My tach down loads look much smoother then the fast system, I could be it is filtered some?
__________________
James Boyce 6052 K/SA Stock National record holder 2015,2018,2 times in 2022,2023 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 1,446
Liked 4,365 Times in 501 Posts
|
![]()
Yes I believe the tachfacts is being filtered and you are correct is it actually a better sample rate than the FAST. Mine does look better on tachfact but definitely not as nice as the super stocker looks on there. I went overboard with wire shield and ferrite cores so I will see what happens.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|