|
|
|
|
02-10-2021, 09:50 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 235
Likes: 488
Liked 565 Times in 70 Posts
|
Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft
I put that in the category of 20 things that add up to make a difference.
If your goal is 5 to 6 under, at this time, it's not worth the effort or cost. |
|
|
| Liked |
|
02-11-2021, 09:26 AM
|
#2 |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 1,954
Liked 10,830 Times in 2,251 Posts
|
Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft
As my friend George would say “ if it can’t hurt it helps”
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
|
02-11-2021, 11:00 AM
|
#3 |
|
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,663
Likes: 1,954
Liked 10,830 Times in 2,251 Posts
|
Re: Dumb question... +/- .015 on crankshaft
Tom stock has an undersized limit on how far under a crank pin or main can be turned. I think it’s.070”, unless it’s a FE Ford crank pin of 2.438” it can go to 2.200”. “If can’t hurt it helps”. That is almost 10% reduction in surface area. And so it goes
|
|
|
|
| Liked |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
