Time For A Transmission Rule Change?

Jim Kaekel · 08-13-2021, 10:16 AM

There's a perfectly good example why the Cobra Jets, Drag Paks and COPOS shouldn't have been put in Stock in the first place. GM trans in Fords and Dodges galore. Should have been S/S only. I know...I know..that horse is long out of the barn and running loose.

frank johnson · 08-13-2021, 11:22 AM

how about all have FORD rears.

Myron Piatek · 08-13-2021, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frank johnson

how about all have FORD rears.

Already allowed in SS, and aside from some optimum gear ratio choices, it would slow a lot of Stock cars down with a 9"!

6130 · 08-13-2021, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Myron Piatek

Already allowed in SS

Stock is not Super Stock.

GTS340 · 08-13-2021, 12:27 PM

It's unfortunate Ford and Chryslers don't have a SFI approved case. Then again I think stocker cars should have a vin number too. If safety is the issue. Better safe than sorry. The new cars have some serious power over older muscle cars with some combinations available. Maybe like all safety rules. It would come into play when certain E.T and speed is a factor.

Paul Haszlauer

my69396 · 08-13-2021, 12:38 PM

Wasn't the rule originally that 500 had to be built to run stock and 50 to run super stock?

Ralph A Powell · 08-13-2021, 05:02 PM

YES!

Quote:

Originally Posted by my69396

Wasn't the rule originally that 500 had to be built to run stock and 50 to run super stock?

Cbrinson47 · 08-16-2021, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Kaekel

There's a perfectly good example why the Cobra Jets, Drag Paks and COPOS shouldn't have been put in Stock in the first place. GM trans in Fords and Dodges galore. Should have been S/S only. I know...I know..that horse is long out of the barn and running loose.

ALL of the stock elin. rules SUCK BIG TIME. Stock should be "STOCK" like in 1970-1971 !

1347 · 08-16-2021, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cbrinson47

ALL of the stock elin. rules SUCK BIG TIME. Stock should be "STOCK" like in 1970-1971 !

Is there anything that's the same as 1970/71? Its called evolution wether it's good or not!

08-13-2021, 10:16 AM	#1
Jim Kaekel VIP Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Michigan Posts: 1,229 Likes: 133 Liked 536 Times in 110 Posts	Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change? There's a perfectly good example why the Cobra Jets, Drag Paks and COPOS shouldn't have been put in Stock in the first place. GM trans in Fords and Dodges galore. Should have been S/S only. I know...I know..that horse is long out of the barn and running loose. __________________ Jim Kaekel 3836 STK

08-13-2021, 11:22 AM	#2
frank johnson Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: croydon pa. Posts: 17 Likes: 2 Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts	Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change? how about all have FORD rears.

08-13-2021, 12:27 PM	#5
GTS340 Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2017 Location: Las Vegas, Nv Posts: 877 Likes: 283 Liked 1,355 Times in 414 Posts	Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change? It's unfortunate Ford and Chryslers don't have a SFI approved case. Then again I think stocker cars should have a vin number too. If safety is the issue. Better safe than sorry. The new cars have some serious power over older muscle cars with some combinations available. Maybe like all safety rules. It would come into play when certain E.T and speed is a factor. Paul Haszlauer

08-13-2021, 12:38 PM	#6
my69396 Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 286 Likes: 1 Liked 46 Times in 20 Posts	Re: Time For A Transmission Rule Change? Wasn't the rule originally that 500 had to be built to run stock and 50 to run super stock?