HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Nostalgia Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2021, 12:33 PM   #1
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Stasko View Post
Class Racer Info will tell you if the combination is hydraulic or solid.

That being said, for the most accurate info, you would need the blueprint specs from the actual years you are researching. It seems some things have changed through the years in the NHRA Classification Guides, so what is published now, may not be what was originally published in 1962, 1963, etc.
Thanks I did look in there but just copied in the excerpts above that gave valve LIFT.

For the 361/305hp the NHRA Blueprint .doc files say
1960=M lift .446 .458
1961=H or M lift .430 .430 or .446 .458
1962=H lift .444 .456

Note that 1962 says "H", but the "H" cam was always either .390 .390 lift or .430 .430 lift. That .444-.446 intake .456-.458 exhaust lift is almost always an "M" cam everywhere else it's listed. I'd bet all the factory cars were "H" cam but was wondering, was there an "M" cam option for 1962 with one of those "special letters to NHRA" that all of them wrote now & then.

Seems the National Winners/Records 361/305 cars were ALL 1962 so I'm trying to figure why, other than lower head cc, that year was so "hot".
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2021, 10:56 AM   #2
jimi
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

62 361/305,271 is a great combo for stock even better in a 6 or 9 passinger wagon the worst parts of this combo is finding the intake.
jimi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2021, 12:20 PM   #3
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

I did find some info over on HAMB.
See pg554, Chuck Norton said that Kempton ran a solid cam in his 62-361/305-4v.

I'm just guessing here, that it was the same solid as in the 383/343-8v combo?


https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/...01085/page-554
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2021, 12:29 PM   #4
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

We will see what this does in modern times. Working on getting the piston approved.
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 11-10-2021, 12:36 PM   #5
DeuceCoupe
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Wong View Post
We will see what this does in modern times. Working on getting the piston approved.
Do you recall the piston min volume cc's?
NHRA Blueprint file doesnt have that detail in it.
DeuceCoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2021, 01:22 PM   #6
Paul Wong
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 384
Likes: 101
Liked 419 Times in 85 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

There is no volume its completely flat. Piston to valve clearance will be an issue.
Paul Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Liked
Old 09-22-2022, 12:11 PM   #7
mopar68
VIP Member
 
mopar68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 8
Liked 44 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: 1962 Mopars, 361/305 HP

__________________
"The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws." - Tacitus
mopar68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.