HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2008, 04:10 PM   #1
denny harvey
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: pataskala ohio
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ideal 2009 Camaro Stocker

i work in alot of auto plants like Gm,ford bmw , mopar and other stamping plants,and i dont think gm looks as the hipo challenger as its competition,not enough to be made,however the new mustangs have the brass talking to them selves,as in the muscle car days as it is today,the mustang is the only real competition to the camaro.that is the car it has to line up to.i am no ford guy but GM and mopar only dream of the number mustang sales..ford hit it out of the park with the new mustang and i dont hear that they fear the new camaro or dodge..just my 2 cents...step it up Gm..lol...denny
denny harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 04:21 PM   #2
Chad Rhodes
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the Green Grass Grows, AL
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Ideal 2009 Camaro Stocker

LS7 detuned to 450, if my estimate of the weight is correct
__________________
Chad Rhodes 2113 I/SA
Chad Rhodes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:14 PM   #3
Jack Matyas
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethlehem , PA -Christmas City , USA
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 406
Liked 2,051 Times in 399 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jack Matyas
Talking Re: Ideal 2009 Camaro Stocker

Scott -- For my money a warmed over LS2 would be plenty -- something in the area of 425 to 450 HP should do the job for most . I can't wait to get my hands on one........it will make one of the neatest looking stockers I've ever had ! ! !

PS -- Adding an LS7 or an LS9 as an option for AA/SA would be neat but very expensive to most .
__________________
Jack Matyas 1547 FS/C 2015 Camaro COPO # 62- 2012 Camaro Convertible COPO
Jack Matyas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 07:57 PM   #4
Tim H
VIP Member
 
Tim H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 1,073
Liked 482 Times in 159 Posts
Default Re: Ideal 2009 Camaro Stocker

The Real LS7 displaced 454 ci, and this new thing should have been labelled something else !
Tim H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 09:30 PM   #5
Travis Miller
Member
 
Travis Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
Liked 276 Times in 27 Posts
Default Re: Ideal 2009 Camaro Stocker

Scott, One thing to keep in mind when planning a new car is cost. A stripped down race special that is not burdened with luxury options will go a long way in keeping the price affordable. One only has to refer back to the Chevy archives to see how 427 Biscaynes, bench seat Novas, and basic Camaro Z-28's dominated dragstrips around the country in the past. That domination by low cost high performance Chevrolets back then set a precedent for the industry that has held strong over the years. With that kind of history, a new high performance Camaro built with todays technology but kept affordable in the showrooms will keep everyone wanting one of their own. As for the selection of engine in the new Camaro, all the Corvette engines look great.

For those interested in seeing the engines Chevrolet has in store for the Corvette go to:

http://corvettemuseum.com/specs/2007/index.shtml

then click on Specs/Download to see a breakdown of 2008 and 2009 engines

Travis

(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed by me on this forum are exactly that, my opinions.)
Travis Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.