|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 425
Liked 242 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=GTS340;657056]I guess if you care. It would be nice to know how these changes were calculated. It seems to me mistakes are on racers to find now. You start questioning weights/factors like this one.
1971 Dodge Challenger 340/275. Challenger r/t Sedan 10.82 Challenger convertible 9.91 Paul Also there is now a 1971 TA that is a natural G car * Manual 290hp 11.03
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 215
Likes: 88
Liked 439 Times in 69 Posts
|
![]()
They should just get rid of the shipping weights like they did for GT, if you can get to the weight then so be it.
__________________
Herbie Null 201 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|