|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greencastle pa
Posts: 215
Likes: 88
Liked 439 Times in 69 Posts
|
![]()
I understand them going back to the old shipping weights because of cars that have been running for over 50 years would now be gone, that would not be fair. What’s not fair is cars that have been in the guide for over 40 years wrong and they correct them and then change them back knowing they are wrong. I will just have to summit my review of the car I have because it has the wrong shipping weight and is in the wrong natural class. Two wrongs do not make a right, get rid of the shipping weights and keep all combos in the guide is the only way to fix this mess.
__________________
Herbie Null 201 SS Last edited by Herbie Null; 02-13-2022 at 08:23 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,646
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,745 Times in 2,235 Posts
|
![]()
From what I have seen on the AMA sheets not all manufacturers use the same formula to figure shipping weight. Some use curb weight minus gas and coolant, some used a figure they turned into the states for licensing and tax purposes, some appeared to use 95% of curb weight. An earlier car of the same manufacturer’s was figured differently than a later vehicle by the same company.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 93
Likes: 1
Liked 42 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Great post Charlie. I'm not racing anymore but I know that would have made my life a lot easier and enjoyable!
__________________
Sam Hamod 3456 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|