Divisional at Famoso

Sam The Butcher · 10-16-2022, 12:16 AM

Default Re: Divisional at Famoso
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTX JOHN View Post
MY mistake = The 301 is legal at this time.
The 666 which possibly is a better intake maybe
is the one currently illegal on the 64 383.
I assume that was the problem.

The manifold rules have moved around a bit on this combo
and I am not current on it.
Well we just got back from the Class Final in D/SA.
While in the back behind the lanes while preparing for the
final = The two guys who were running this 64 came up to
me and got in my face and asked me, Are you that John Irving
that posted this reply to this thread. I replied in the affirmative.
He then said "Do you want to fight me". I have never met him before.
Most of you guys know I am in my Mid 70's and I am struggling just
to walk around after my last couple surgeries. These gentlemen are 1/2
my age!! I am very surprised at this situation!! (The only conclusion one can draw is. This is the act of A guilty party. Sad to see this type of unprofessional behavior at a race track)

RULER · 10-16-2022, 12:30 AM

Well if this would have been a 1.15 under run would he have turned himself in???? I bet not, if this was another brand all you mopar racers would be looking for blood, but he’s a good guy, threatens a older stock racer that didn’t even call them what they are. CHEATER

Frank Castros · 10-16-2022, 09:14 AM

I'm very sure Jim Hale being THE 383 authority can clarify which intake is the best and legal.
John for them to threaten you like that should be investigated by the N.H.R.A. and I also believe the D7 team has some explaining to do regarding their decision to re-classify this car especially after the -1.21 run in Stock Eliminator.
This is outrageous and I for one have never heard of this happening before.

10-16-2022, 12:16 AM	#1
Sam The Butcher Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Posts: 24 Likes: 59 Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts	Re: Divisional at Famoso Default Re: Divisional at Famoso Quote: Originally Posted by GTX JOHN View Post MY mistake = The 301 is legal at this time. The 666 which possibly is a better intake maybe is the one currently illegal on the 64 383. I assume that was the problem. The manifold rules have moved around a bit on this combo and I am not current on it. Well we just got back from the Class Final in D/SA. While in the back behind the lanes while preparing for the final = The two guys who were running this 64 came up to me and got in my face and asked me, Are you that John Irving that posted this reply to this thread. I replied in the affirmative. He then said "Do you want to fight me". I have never met him before. Most of you guys know I am in my Mid 70's and I am struggling just to walk around after my last couple surgeries. These gentlemen are 1/2 my age!! I am very surprised at this situation!! (The only conclusion one can draw is. This is the act of A guilty party. Sad to see this type of unprofessional behavior at a race track)

10-16-2022, 12:30 AM	#2
RULER Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 222 Likes: 15 Liked 58 Times in 18 Posts	Re: Divisional at Famoso Well if this would have been a 1.15 under run would he have turned himself in???? I bet not, if this was another brand all you mopar racers would be looking for blood, but he’s a good guy, threatens a older stock racer that didn’t even call them what they are. CHEATER

10-16-2022, 09:14 AM	#3
Frank Castros VIP Member Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: The Lowcountry. Posts: 3,003 Likes: 2,665 Liked 2,753 Times in 974 Posts	Re: Divisional at Famoso I'm very sure Jim Hale being THE 383 authority can clarify which intake is the best and legal. John for them to threaten you like that should be investigated by the N.H.R.A. and I also believe the D7 team has some explaining to do regarding their decision to re-classify this car especially after the -1.21 run in Stock Eliminator. This is outrageous and I for one have never heard of this happening before.