|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: North Carolina, Ohio
Posts: 97
Likes: 19
Liked 50 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
The 62-67 383 had the 666, 301, intakes approved 16 years ago and everyone was running them. I was running the 666 on my car, someone complained about unfair advantage and NHRA banned both. Leaving one that will not work and is 30 hp down from the other two. Mr Hale took the fight to NHRA and out of it, the 6267 383 keeps the 301 but lost the 666. The 301 is faster on my car! I went to a 1968 car. I talked to the Gentleman that had the 1964 car in ISA and last time car was run. It was legal and they did not know of the rule change.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 14
Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts
|
![]()
Bubski says “ look at the bright side “ at least he didn’t go 10.50 in SS/JA after they let him in SS !!! Straight outta I/SA !!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 159
Likes: 18
Liked 129 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Stop global whining |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 497
Likes: 162
Liked 223 Times in 73 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ontario, calif
Posts: 211
Likes: 61
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
Why not it's A chevy !
__________________
Joe Schweigert 751 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|