|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 97
Likes: 56
Liked 172 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
We're not talking about GT cars, or Factory Stock/Super Stock or any of those classes. Just talking about the late model cars that are allowed to run in traditional Stock Eliminator classes. Also,if we are being genuine, all of our cars must revert to the original OE horsepower ratings, none of this subtract 12% business. I admit I have a small gift on my car, I would have to add about 50lbs. From what I see most late model muscle cars would have to add about 600lbs. or so. That would seem to even things out.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 97
Likes: 56
Liked 172 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
Didn't mean to hijack this post, I just found it a little odd that someone with a late model stock eliminator car wants older combinations to use stock piston rings when the late model cars have enjoyed a wealth of "gifts" from NHRA. Why don't they just limit Stock to 2009 and newer cars.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Watch what you wish for, it might come true! It happened once back in the '70's.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 2,175
Liked 2,355 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 383
Likes: 70
Liked 30 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On a hilltop in Pa.
Posts: 4,504
Likes: 3,606
Liked 7,814 Times in 1,748 Posts
|
![]()
Ya know, I personally don't see this as an advantage. I'd much rather deal with the frictional losses of a 12 bolt or a Dana in a "Stocker".
Getting back on track here, my preference for "sealing up" a motor has always been a 5/64 groove with a good old fashioned cast iron "claimer" ring set.
__________________
Billy Nees 1188 STK, SS I'm not spending 100K to win 2K Last edited by Billy Nees; 11-30-2022 at 09:33 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 2,175
Liked 2,355 Times in 554 Posts
|
![]()
That's the obvious one. I was against that when they made it legal for the production cars.
What else?
__________________
Daren Poole-Adams NHRA Stock/SS 2007 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 787
Likes: 941
Liked 1,471 Times in 308 Posts
|
![]()
I don't see the 9" Ford as an advantage. In fact, it might mean additional
expense for some that have put a 12 bolt carrier in to reduce the frictional losses inherent to the Ford 9". J.R. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 97
Likes: 56
Liked 172 Times in 53 Posts
|
![]()
Maybe you would rather have the 10L90 ten speed transmission in the car instead of the T200 or T350? That's what came in them didn't it. I understand the earlier versions had 8 speeds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|