|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 622
Likes: 312
Liked 692 Times in 200 Posts
|
![]()
It may be a mistake, checking on classracerinfo.com I found the only restricted manifold was the -C cast iron
Intake. The intake manifolds vary depending on hp ratings and heads used. Intake Manifolds: Casting No. C6AE-H Aluminum C7AE-F Aluminum C8OE-A Cast Iron C8OE-C Cast Iron May not be used in Stock, SS ONL I looked at the NHRA blueprint file, note #6 is alternate intake and list the two aluminum intakes. Where did you find the “may not be used in stock” note as I don’t see it?
__________________
Mike 7570 A/SA Last edited by Mike Gray; 07-22-2024 at 07:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Now, in the .DOC files, all 4 intakes you listed are LEGAL in Stock, for all 3 years 1968-69-70. The online detail also shows all 4 intakes legal for all engine combos & years ie 1968-69 428-A 428-B 428-C 428-D 1970 428 428# Exception: 1968-428-335-B shows C8OE-C Cast Iron May not be used in Stock, SS ONLY No reason for the extra words to be there- of all intakes, C8OE-C should always be legal on any 428CJ (except maybe the 1st 50 cars built in Dec 1967 with C7AF-F) because after very early 68, every 428CJ came factory with C8OE-C iron. So I think this part 1968-428-335-B shows C8OE-C Cast Iron May not be used in Stock, SS ONLY Is just an echo from the old files. Needs to be fixed in here: http://classracerinfo.com/EngineSpec...3030&MAKE=Ford OK so now, all the intakes are legal for all years. Our guess on the Ford forums is that C7AE-F C8OE-A C8OE-C should all be legal for Model Year MY68 because cars left the factory that way, C7AE-F on the 1st 50 (Dec 1967) cars, then C8OE-A iron early on, then C8OE-C iron. C6AE-H was not used in production, but is identical to C7AE-F except for the thermostat housing hole so makes sense to make that legal too. For MY69-70, only C8OE-C iron was factory, but I guess the rules are getting more liberal now. This clears up a lot thanks for reminding me to look anew at classracerinfo.com Last edited by DeuceCoupe; 07-23-2024 at 01:45 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]()
Continued:
In this sense, the old circa Aug.2008 Blueprint.DOC files were more accurate for MY69-70 428CJ: They list ONLY the C8OE-C iron as stock, NO listing for C8OE-A ironor C6AE-H aluminum or any other intake for MY69-70. That was accurate vs actual MY69-70 production. The only (circa Aug.2008) .DOC file i had questioned was the MY68 file, which correctly listed C8OE-A and C8OE-C iron as legal, but then had C6AE-H as not stock legal. In fact, even that file was missing the C7AE-F aluminum which was factory on the 1st 50 cars built in Dec 1967, though C7AE-F is functionally identical powerwise to C6AE-H. Wow a lot of typing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texarkana Ark/TX
Posts: 2,446
Likes: 575
Liked 880 Times in 311 Posts
|
![]()
Always check in: https://www.nhraracer.com/content/ge...634&zoneid=132
That is what NHRA Tech goes by not ClassRacer
__________________
Adger Smith (Former SS) Last edited by Adger Smith; 07-22-2024 at 09:09 PM. Reason: sp |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 274
Likes: 98
Liked 48 Times in 44 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Those .DOC files look the same as whats on classracerinfo That is, much more liberal (vs the 2008 editions) even for MY69-70, so the same comments I made already apply. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|