|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 2
Likes: 23
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
As a fan from Down Under I find it difficult to believe a few things.
1. The NHRA didn't specify the OD of the pulleys (as well as tooth count) to ensure this didn't happen. (Or the temptation there to explore a grey area of the rules) I am sure there are other classes with toothed belts that have explored this in the past and NHRA would have closed the loophole? 2. Specify the pulleys had to be marked and manufactured by Magnuson, or have an NHRA approval number on it. 3. Inspect these critical components after every pass with fuel and weight, considering it is a 10 second job to measure the OD with a Vernier and count the teeth to see if there is any distinctive gaps between the teeth. 4. Question why covers had been put over the rear drive belt (covers were mentioned in this thread earlier) as the cover is there to hide something and not protect the driver when there is a windscreen and firewall between the driver and the pulleys. This has tarnished my view of racers and engine builders that I look up to in the /FS, /FX world as I have built my GM car using the /FS rules as inspiration. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 130
Liked 451 Times in 77 Posts
|
![]()
Years ago NHRA tech measured pulley sizes in the alcohol classes with a piece of blower belt numbering the teeth like a ruler as an easy check for pulley teeth. This clearly would've called out the cheating as the space between the pulley teeth would've been counted. The problem was they were allowed to cover the pulleys as if and when the belt breaks it can take out a harness. This should've never been allowed and overdrive checked with a simple system belt ruler as tech has done in the past. Keep it simple.
Fines don't seem to hinder cheating, suspensions non-existent here. Since self tech was used, How about self enforcement from their competitors. Or self tech your competitor, like in grade school when you passed your test to your neighbor to grade. Sad to see NHRA tech come to this and yes I blame them for either never checking or turning an eye. A year and a half..... Damn! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 362
Likes: 1,445
Liked 576 Times in 137 Posts
|
![]()
A deeper dive into this subject is up on Competition Plus.
https://competitionplus.com/drag-rac...illing-to-talk I found this paragraph particularly amusing: Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: The Lowcountry.
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 2,689
Liked 2,760 Times in 976 Posts
|
![]()
At NHRA events NHRA a certified spec pulley(s) should be handed to the FX racers and documented.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 353
Likes: 502
Liked 301 Times in 113 Posts
|
![]()
The lone HEMI is bye-bye for greener pasture$. Deja' Vu much?!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
All this hoopla from guys that don't race the class about nothing. They will change the pulley and continue to race and WIN!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cumming GA
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 1,299
Liked 1,440 Times in 301 Posts
|
![]()
Perhaps it’s time for some personal reflection about that comment Ed?
__________________
James Schaechter 3163 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#8 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
I've reflected and my opinions here are no less valid than anyone else that posts here! There is no requirement to compete in Stock nor Super Stock to post in this forum. Further, this thread isn't about Stock nor Super Stock!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|