|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 619
Likes: 312
Liked 690 Times in 199 Posts
|
![]()
Strange thing, I can understand what Ed and everyone else is saying and I think both sides are right. If you pick up or lose 60ft you should pick up or lose incremental and total down track as long as everything else remains the same, such as tune up and weather.
I think Ed's version of changing 60ft times relates to his shock settings, other guys I'm not sure of? I'll add my own experience from last weekend where a timing change picked up my 60ft from 1.40 to 1.37 but the finish line et and mph were slightly slower.
__________________
Mike 7570 A/SA Last edited by Mike Gray; 10-10-2024 at 05:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Noblesville,In
Posts: 108
Likes: 7
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
SS/AH 328X |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 160
Liked 759 Times in 379 Posts
|
![]()
Ah, deep staging, that's another topic that will unravel a few here that don't understand why, don't understand what it does to the 60 foot time and ET and/or think it's cheating.
![]() Yes, I deep staged my Chevelle for the entire time I raced it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|