Dear SRAC Members

[Torque addict]

JEFF!

We have had our differences on here before, but in this case I have to say..."WELL STATED!"
I could not agree on your point more...we all need to think of WHY these rules were put into being in the first place and their relevance of the NHRA model that attracted us all to this racing format in the first place!

See my postings on the thread "If Wally was not already dead, this would have killed him" for my views on this new rule.
WHAT is NHRA's RUSH to IMPOSE this???

Why must they do something mid stream part way through the year, it is not like Indy is a new race...
Why not put it up for discussion for the 2009 rule book and INDY rather than IMPOSING it on us?
The new 1000ft fuel rule, it is a safety issues and had to be implmented asap, I get that...but this?? wtf

Can there be TOO many stockers and Super Stocks at the Big GO? I think not!....
Now as for the "Super Classes" that the fans hate who try to create the illusion of a heads up race ( Blast and Bog throttle stoppers), reduce them if there is a space or time concern....These are de facto bracket bombers. The Nationals are DRAG RACE not a bracket race. No place at Indy or any national event other than a bracket nationals for these guys.

The CORE of drag racing are the PRO Clasees and the grass roots S & S/S. Period.


Cheers;

Derek

[Alan Roehrich]

If you HAVEN'T seen a derogatory comment directed towards the representatives, you haven't been reading the threads. Woodro Josey and Jeff Teuton were called out BY NAME on this board, and that is ONE example. There have been multiple derogatory comments directed towards the entire committee.

Unless you are a member of the committee, or privy to the rules that apply to the committee, you do not even know if anyone records the minutes, or, more importantly, if NHRA even allows them to be published, if they are recorded.

From what Jim Waldo wrote, the committee voted to no longer allow people who single for a class win to get a pass into the final eliminations. It should be obvious to anyone paying attention at that point that NHRA made the other change, that is not allowing ANY class winners who did not qualify by ET into the final eliminator.

IF you've been listening, and asking the right people, you've heard by now that this latest rule was only PART of what was proposed and voted on. I've been told by multiple sources that there was also a proposal to lower the indexes 2 tenths. As to the class win rule, well, that is quoted in another post, and above in this post.

It's called an ADVISORY committee. Meaning these people advise NHRA, and NOT that NHRA does what the committee tells them.

By the way, so far there are two polls, and I have voted in neither, and both show that by at least some margin, at least a slim majority would prefer that the 128 fastest cars qualify. Of course, these are not scientific polls, and only reflect the opinions of a few who come to these forums and vote.

I'm not a fan of the 0.90 Super classes. However, if you are so deluded as to think that NHRA is going to kick them out, and let more Stock and Super Stock racers in, you are just that, deluded. They require only a cursory safety tech, and a heads up Pro tree. They are 20% the trouble we class racers are. I used to crew multiple cars in the 0.90 Super classes, I never cared much for them then, and do not now, although I have some VERY good friends who race those very classes. But I sure do find it amusing that people who say no one has the right to tell THEM they shouldn't have a place to race are very quick to tell someone else the exact same thing.

[Torque addict]

Originally Posted by Alan Roehrich

If you HAVEN'T seen a derogatory comment directed towards the representatives, you haven't been reading the threads. Woodro Josey and Jeff Teuton were called out BY NAME on this board, and that is ONE example. There have been multiple derogatory comments directed towards the entire committee.

Unless you are a member of the committee, or privy to the rules that apply to the committee, you do not even know if anyone records the minutes, or, more importantly, if NHRA even allows them to be published, if they are recorded.

From what Jim Waldo wrote, the committee voted to no longer allow people who single for a class win to get a pass into the final eliminations. It should be obvious to anyone paying attention at that point that NHRA made the other change, that is not allowing ANY class winners who did not qualify by ET into the final eliminator.

IF you've been listening, and asking the right people, you've heard by now that this latest rule was only PART of what was proposed and voted on. I've been told by multiple sources that there was also a proposal to lower the indexes 2 tenths. As to the class win rule, well, that is quoted in another post, and above in this post.

It's called an ADVISORY committee. Meaning these people advise NHRA, and NOT that NHRA does what the committee tells them.

By the way, so far there are two polls, and I have voted in neither, and both show that by at least some margin, at least a slim majority would prefer that the 128 fastest cars qualify. Of course, these are not scientific polls, and only reflect the opinions of a few who come to these forums and vote.

I'm not a fan of the 0.90 Super classes. However, if you are so deluded as to think that NHRA is going to kick them out, and let more Stock and Super Stock racers in, you are just that, deluded. They require only a cursory safety tech, and a heads up Pro tree. They are 20% the trouble we class racers are. I used to crew multiple cars in the 0.90 Super classes, I never cared much for them then, and do not now, although I have some VERY good friends who race those very classes. But I sure do find it amusing that people who say no one has the right to tell THEM they shouldn't have a place to race are very quick to tell someone else the exact same thing.

WOW!!

For someone who takes exception in your posting to "derogatory remarks" that you percieve, you sure quick to dole them out!
No one is deluded sir!

If you wish to trade insults, I do not and you are in fact VERY derogatory and insulting.
You can prove that you have class with an apology ..or not.

I KNOW NHRA will not elminate the So-Called "Super" Clases from Natiaon Events.

They are a CASH COW and although boring as hell, with a lot of nice guys running them, they will remain for the reasons you state.

I have to give NHRA credit for being " inclusive" in rtecent years and responding to trends.
Examples are: Sport Compacts, Pro Stock Truck (knee jerk reaction to NASCAR Truck Clasees) , Pro Stock Bike...that class still has me wondering why BIKES are at the drags, No cars run at the bike events do they??

I am stubborn in accepting the fact that NHRA has been slow in changing it's logo and name to reflect that it is really now the NHRC...the National Hot Rod CORPORATION . dedicated to PROFIT!
It is all about the Bottom line, balance sheets and profits.
The fan and the racer are an afterthought that get lost in the shuffle, as long as there is SOME source of revenue they keep proving that they really care very little for those who supported them.

You must know PT Barnum's old line. NHRA has it as it's credo....


Now please do not take my opinion as DEROGATORY, I would not want to ellicit more insutls from you beacuse my OPINION Upset you...after all according to you I am deluded.

Cheers;
Derek

[Alan Roehrich]

Derek, I said "IF you are so deluded". No where did I say "Derek, you ARE deluded". See, the word IF is the operative word. I owe you no apology, and you'll get none. I can be insulting, but I choose not to.

As to derogatory comments, Jeff Teuton and Woodro Josey were called out here on this site by name, and it was done BEFORE anyone knew what happened. I have only met Jeff Teuton once, briefly, in passing, in the staging lanes. However, Jeff has been helping to support sportsman racing and class racing for years. I know Woodro Josey pretty well. Woodro has been doing this about as long as just about anyone here, and I'd say Woodro has about as good a grasp on what is good for class racing as anyone even remotely likely to be willing to give their time to represent us. The remarks made about Woodro and Jeff were entirely uncalled for. I did not "perceive" them, they were posted plainly. The ink on the paper the rule was written on was not dry before people began their tirades, and the tirades haven't stopped yet.

[Dick Butler]

Derek, I know Alan and I am sure in his defense at this point he has been pushed to respond as you see his wording. His values and position I feel you would find very close to the thoughts you have offered. Reading the written word is tough . Thanks

[Alan Roehrich]

Ed, (note, I have the courtesy and respect to spell your name correctly) I have no problem whatsoever with anyone requesting information from their representative. I do have a problem with someone insulting a personal friend of mine for no valid reason. There was no reason, and no excuse for it. But the same people who do things like that will wonder why no one wants to represent them, and no one wants to answer their questions or address their concerns.

I posted the name and email address of every person on the committee. I also posted the link to the page that detailed all of it. It's sort of like knowing who your congressman or representative is and how to reach them.

However, I agree, more could be done to make the process better, and more transparent. For example, NHRA could put up a page on the Lucas Oil part of the site that gives the addresses, it is actually there, but there needs to be a link on the main page. NHRA could post the agenda and the minutes. But the committee can only do what NHRA allows them to do, using the tools NHRA gives them.

[Bruce Noland]

I can feel the pain of the Bump-in guys on this issue. I have been unable to obtain information from nhra on several occaisions and it is no fun.

But this issue is finished. Someone comes up with a copy of an email message from a person who admits that he is at least a little fuzzy on the details of the SRAC vote. This information is no smoking gun.

From what I have been told the vote went 6 - 0 to eliminate class winner bump in. One person was not able to attend the conference call. And now the poll shows that the racing public believes the class winner bump in should be eliminated. nhra looks at this stuff.

The small group of bump in advocates on this site can come out and create the appearance of support for bumping faster cars from the sheet. But, in the end, they fail to persuade the majority of the racers and nhra.

[Jim Wahl]

I have received timely responses from Jim Waldo (see above) Evan Smith and Woodro Josey. I thank them all! Below is what I received and my response. Jim

Jim,

Thank you for the email. I believe none of the reps (myself included) has responded because whether we are right or wrong we will be taken to task in unfair manner on the boards. As of right now, there is no way we can contact each and every racer on every topic. Perhaps we could establish a forum with registered racers. But for now, this would require me personally contacting with about 400-500 S/SS racers in my division alone every time an issue comes up. As for responding on the web, I just don’t have time to get into an internet debate, especially when half of those who post are no-names. Now on to your question. After receiving many requests from actual racers, we were asked to look into changing the qualifying rule because many have been bumped out at Indy and feel that a slow car should not bump out a fast one. Well, we know this will break tradition so we talked it over and also had a conference call with NHRA. There are seven reps and we all love the sport and it’s tradition, but what’s right is right and at times the sport has, and will continue, to change with the times. Just look at the new 1,000-foot rule, talk about breaking tradition?

First, I will tell you I am a purist—more than some—less than others. I don’t like change unless it helps the sport. But look at the past, change is always taking place: Stock has gone from 7-inch tires to 9-inch tires, to stiff valve springs, to wild cams, to radials and trick transmissions and light brakes, and so on. We have had rule changes (for better or worse) and the sport will evolve whether you or I like it. Lately, we’ve seen smaller fields, quotas for entry lists and so on. OK, you, and many others, speak of tradition in regards to qualifying. Our goal is not to break tradition, but serve the majority of the racers. You may or may not agree with this, but many racers are for this change, even if they don’t voice an opinion on the internet. Anyone registered on Classracer.com can vote, you can have your mother or brother vote so that poll has no validity.

Looking back, any racer can recall that the qualifying “tradition” was that Class winners earned their way into the eliminator by having the fastest car in their category and/or by out-driving the competition. When the tradition began there were fewer classes and nary a single. Over the last decade even a blind man can see that this “tradition” (at Indy) has turned into something totally different. Being a Class winner is something a racer should be proud of. I have about 15 Class trophies and I’ve singled for about five or six of them. To be honest, the single wins mean nothing to me. Sure I earned them, the trophies look cool, and I couldn’t control if no one showed up to race in my class, but there is noting to be proud of because I didn’t race anyone. On the other hand, the ones I’ve earned mean the world! How can a racer expect to race if he is not quicker than the guy ahead of him? Should a racer get to run in the eliminator because of a rule, that has become a loophole, allows them to compete, even if it is tradition? It’s like the provisional in NASCAR. If you really want to argue about tradition, then what you are arguing for is the right for the fastest cars to race? Or should single class winners get to compete even if they are slow, because of an outdated rule, even if it is tradition? Stock and Super Stock are performance-based classes, shouldn’t that count?

Fact: Single class cars can still win Class and race, now they must make the show on performance, which is the intent of the original rule. It is not the fault of a racer if he or she is the only one in a particular class, just make your car quick enough to make the show based on performance, that’s all. Indy will showcase the 128 best performing cars, which is in the spirit of the original tradition.

Jim, I will tell you that personally I voted for the qualified field, accept if a racer actually beats someone, then he or she should make the show, regardless of how quick the car is. While I still feel it should be the quickest 128 cars regardless of Class wins, there is something to be said for beating the competition and that in itself should be a means to ear you way in. So, I voted for the tradition and not with my personal feelings. And the majority of the SRAC members did the same. Still, NHRA went with an “all or nothing” approach, which was out of the hands of the committee.

Evan


Evan,
Thank you for replying to me in such a timely manner! After reading your email I find myself agreeing with you almost 100%. You are obviously an educated, level headed man and I believe you will serve your Division and all of the Sportsman racers well. I thank you for such a detailed explanation of the situation from the SRAC's point. This is what was needed, it was needed last week however. If I came off as critical or harsh I apologize, but it was born from frustration. Frustration from lack of communication from the Committee. I still feel the Committee should communicate with the masses on important developments and the forums are a great way to do it. After all it was the way you members were elected. You are a professional communicator, I hope you will use your talent to inform your fellow racers and nip in the bud the type of humors and fears that have been exhibited in this situation.
As I wrote to Woodro, I could live with the rule the way the Committee submitted it, however I do not agree with the final version. I think you all, as the Committee, should voice your displeasure with NHRA about being usurped. That said, I thank you and all of the members of the SRAC for the work you have and will do for your fellow racers. Thank you, Woodro, and Jim Waldo again personally for your timely response.

Jim Wahl

[Jack McCarthy]

alan,

i did not "call out" woodro and jeff... they are my friends

if you take time to read my post i simply stated i could not beleive the srac could have voted this way, especially knowing woodro and jeff (purists i thought) were on the committee.

my srac rep told us the "vote" was taken as part of the discussion over lowering indexes -.20 and wasnt really clear that the resulting rule was actually what they voted on (see evan / waldo response).

i for one am sick of the constant enhancement process where EVERY time a rule changes the class i love is further deteriorated from the way i was brought up and the class NHRA sold me on 30 years ago. once again it will cost the jim gowers, marty buth's MORE $$$ to race if they wanna be able to go to indy... and WHY i ask and that is the question NO ONE has been willing to address.

simple enough ?
and sorry to woodro and jeff if you took it wrong.

jack mccarthy

[Yo Ken]

Jim,

I would like to point out that there is a section for racers only. I have carefully confirmed all members that have access to this section are racers, and that they have raced within the last 2 years.

There are 296 members registered for the competition only section. Of the 296, approximately 220-240 are Stock/Super Stock racers.

Why this section is not used to get a better prospective on how the class racer feels is beyond me.

Any poll that is voted on in that section are by racers only. I asked Lynn if he wanted his poll moved, he declined. Chris Hill started a poll, but as you can see there are very few votes.

The tools are here, but it seems the very few like yourself have the passion or even care where class racing is headed.