|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 421
Likes: 13
Liked 26 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
Hey FJ,
Colin Wigle is running a 429 rated at 371, not the 460 rated at 300. He is the first guy to even attempt to run that engine in probably 20 years in S/S. 700+ lbs of Dearborn iron sitting in that unique Mustang. No aftermarket heads or anything like some of the combos have. I think he is doing very well for a brand new combination!
__________________
Bill Harris ex 2172 STK ex 2272 S/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cayuga, Canada
Posts: 298
Likes: 37
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
You miss the point.
Whether it be the first crack at a combo or not, the factor needs to be correct before the engine is run. The source of the heads, aftermarket or OEM doesn't matter. The correct HP can be accurately calculated and then a factor assigned. FJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Plainfield (INDY) Indiana
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Congrats to Frank Grossi for finding the combo and having the courage to run it. Also congrats to all the guys at Eaton for making the power and Phil Mandella for the killer car and chassis set up.
__________________
Lynn A McCarty 3470 SS Last edited by Lynn A McCarty; 09-06-2008 at 06:54 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cayuga, Canada
Posts: 298
Likes: 37
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
My point is the system as it is, is antiquated.
It allows a combination to run at an unreasonable HP factor until (if) the factoring system catches up. Yes, I'll credit someone to choose something new, but the factor needs to be reasonable and with today's technology, that is not difficult to achieve. In the meantime, it makes the tried and true (and in many cases overfactored) combinations un-competitive. FJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The real problem, as I see it, is that there are some combos that are classified wrong. They will run with an enormous amount of weight and still run 1.3 or more under. The tech people should be aware of somebody running real fast then being way over at the scales. It is sandbagging to save their bogus combo. If they get hit, they will just remove some weight and go for it again. The combo can be milked for years like this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cayuga, Canada
Posts: 298
Likes: 37
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Running overweight is an additional problem of engines being under-factored.
It's always been difficult to understand why NHRA tech doesn't take this into consideration when re-factoring a combo. After all, they record weights every time the car goes over the scales, so why isn't this included in the re-factoring? This is another reason why engine combinations, especially new ones should be properly appraised for the correct HP factor before being approved for use. The current factors for a couple of these combos are out by approximately 30hp! FJ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: chewelah wa
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
ALL i know is that is one fast car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
I second that one Bill!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|