|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: East China, MI
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I need some help in choosing of a front shock. My brother and I are new at Stock eliminator racing and could use a bit of advice. We currently have QA1 adjustable shocks on the rear and Lakewood 90-10 on the front. The Lakewoods are getting old along with being told the Lakewoods are not a good choice to buy new. I really can't afford a set of AFCO's but will spend up to $150 each. I just need an opinion(s) to help us make our decision. I was kind of leaning toward the QA1 units.
Thanks
__________________
Nelson Kowal Stock 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 596
Liked 1,880 Times in 562 Posts
|
![]()
Its great to hear of new guys getting started into stock and super stock racing. My advice to you is to save your money and get a good set of double adjustable shocks for the front of your car. I went the Route with the QA1's. They are only single adjustable. When you loosen the extension it also loosens the compression. I have a set of Santhuff shocks on my car that work very good. The AFCO double adjustable are an excellent choice also. The QA1 shock will be better than what you have but in the end they are not what you need. Hope this helps you make a decision
__________________
Mike Pearson 2485 SS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indy
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I really like my QA1's, but would make a different choice on the valving if I had it to do over.
There is a "R Series" which are looser on the extension, but have no experience with them. All of the QA1's can be custom tuned, and they are a nice piece for the money. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 706
Liked 1,514 Times in 563 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grosse Pointe Woods Mi
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
Car is a 71 Chevelle wagon 402ci,natural k/sa.
__________________
Bob Kowal STK 345 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
I've heard very good reviews on the Calvert front shock from guys that replaced their old Chassis Engineering or even QA1's. Based on what I have heard, and my budget was $300 or less, I would get the Calvert's. Ideally I would wait until I had enough money for the AFCO's or even Santhuff's.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: houston tx
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The story I get from an NMCA/NMRA chassis builder is that QA1's are prone to leakage and of a lesser build quality than what is ideal. They are however affordable
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Calvert
__________________
Bud Lefevre 3075 STK IHRA World Record Holder |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
|
![]()
I have the QA1 R series single adjustable fronts. They have worked great but it would be ideal to have the double adjustable shocks. They make a huge difference over the inexpensive comp engineering or lakewood style shocks.
__________________
Dusty Lowell #1773 STK F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|