|
![]() |
#11 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Monroe, La.
Posts: 301
Likes: 9
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]()
I would guess that anyone not running the 255 combo will argue that there will be not performance loss however as we all know unless you run a combo and do back to back exact conditions your only expressing your opinion. Performance loss or not the cost will be expensive and all the other pieces associated with the cowl hood; air cleaner, cowl seals,paint, cowl hood, etc are just so much junk now.
__________________
Richard Grant 4988 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,821 Times in 413 Posts
|
![]()
Probably the same reason the 67 L-88 Corvette was removed from the guide. Too much crying from too many whiners.
Yet we have cars in Stock Eliminator that were NEVER produced, never mind having a VIN number and being legal to drive on the street. NHRA is no longer the organization it once was.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Glendora,Calif.
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 172
Liked 705 Times in 219 Posts
|
![]()
'70 chevy Monte Carlo convertible. It would be fun to build one and show up at a race with it. How did they arrive at shipping weights for a car built of pure nonexistanium?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ga.
Posts: 521
Likes: 7
Liked 13 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
That's a dumb rule. The factory cowl hood is heavy, anybody running it is subjecting themselves to a weight penalty anyhow.
Someone needs to produce a build sheet of a special order 255 HP 69 with a cowl hood and stuff that in their face. It appears that it wasn't available as stated http://www.camaros.org/forum/index.php?topic=10210.0 BUT, no one knows 100% for sure that a 255 HP model NEVER came off the line with a cowl hood.
__________________
'67 Camaro 1.25 5.77 @ 118 Last edited by 40Coupe; 05-25-2013 at 10:50 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Even more reading.
http://www.classracer.com/classforum...d.php?p=197386 Dwight Sutherland "Since the 1969 production year was abnormally long due to the late introduction of the 1970 model and the immense popularity of the 1969 models, by late April of 1969 to the end of the production in September, the lines got really blurred about restrictions of option combinations. The ZL2 hood option became available on any four-barrel equipped Camaro by that time, so 350-255 cars did come with the hood. As a personal note, I coached a friend of mine in optioning a 1969 Camaro he ordered. He was attending college at the time and was receiving some money from his dad who required "no hot rod". He ordered a base Camaro with an F41 suspension, 350-255, four speed, positraction, spoilers, ZL2 hood, disc brakes, HD rear axle, custom interior and several other comfort features. Nice car. Not too fast, but one that many would covet today. "
__________________
'67 Camaro 1.25 5.77 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What I've noticed in almost all racing classes is that once someone starts dominating a class, people start complaining and get the rules changed.
__________________
'67 Camaro 1.25 5.77 @ 118 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Crookston, MN
Posts: 157
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
1969 camaro, pump gas 540"bbc, jerico 1967 camaro, pump gas efi 620", coan t-400 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Crookston, MN
Posts: 157
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
40Coupe: I just researched the issue on the Camaro site and the LM1 350/255 was only available in the Camaro through December 68. The L65 350/250 2bbl motor replaced it effective January 69. The 327 2bbl motor was also replaced by the 307 2bbl motor at the same time in the Camaro. As I stated in the above post, the two options were not available at the same time from Chevrolet. I hope this sheds some light on the availability of the LM1 and ZL2 factory options.
__________________
1969 camaro, pump gas 540"bbc, jerico 1967 camaro, pump gas efi 620", coan t-400 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Well I guess NHRA has nothing better to do! I can say for my self that there is no performance gain from running the hood but wow does it look much better than the flat hood!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|