|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Has there been any success with 1988 turbo coupe kit?
__________________
Craig Sullivan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
What'd be really cool is the new V6 ecoboost in your mustang!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Sent emails on 4 cyl ecoboost, but kinda waiting to see what comes up w/SEMA, and PRI. Never know what announcements will be made.
__________________
Craig Sullivan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
4 cylinder ecoboost would be cool.
You could run the 6 cylinder ecoboost in SS/DX and not have to worry about getting the engine submitted to NHRA. That would be CRAZY fast with all the things you could do in "modified" SS. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Avon, Indiana
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Why the v6 and not the 4? This will also be a GT deal
__________________
Craig Sullivan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah, the GT deal would be totally different. I just figured you couldn't get the car anywhere near minimum weight in DX with a 4 cylinder, so you might as well put as many cubic inches, and turbo's in there as you can.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|