HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2018, 09:59 PM   #11
Aaron Allison
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: East Palestine, OH
Posts: 218
Likes: 4
Liked 146 Times in 42 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Quick Time does make a 2.3L Ford to Jerico bell, but not for all wheel drive.

https://www.holley.com/products/driv.../parts/RM-4058

I am sure Ross McCombs could make it happen if need be.

-Aaron
__________________
Aaron Allison 395 STK, 395 SS, 3395 SC
Aaron Allison is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2018, 10:32 PM   #12
rawhide
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 270
Likes: 1
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Allison View Post
Quick Time does make a 2.3L Ford to Jerico bell, but not for all wheel drive.

https://www.holley.com/products/driv.../parts/RM-4058

I am sure Ross McCombs could make it happen if need be.

-Aaron
different 2.3 engine, that would be the 2.3 used in Pinto's
rawhide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2018, 10:33 PM   #13
goinbroke2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 869
Likes: 1,462
Liked 355 Times in 140 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

I said this a couple of years ago, a rs focus or an awd Taurus with the twin turbo v6.
Finally they are putting new stuff in the guide besides mustangs!
goinbroke2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 08:53 AM   #14
Steve Polhill
Senior Member
 
Steve Polhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London Ontario
Posts: 515
Likes: 40
Liked 262 Times in 74 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickh View Post
Wonder if Steve Polhill has thought about this combo lol

If Ford Gave me one I'd Race it Factory stock?
__________________
Steve Polhill
3520 STOCK, COMP
Steve Polhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 10:19 AM   #15
Dwight Southerland
VIP Member
 
Dwight Southerland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

What happened to the Mustang and engines that were in the 2017 Ford tech information?
__________________
Dwight Southerland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 11:23 AM   #16
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 504
Liked 329 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Since no others are not listed can they still race them (LOL)???
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 12:49 PM   #17
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 129
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

The way I read the rule book under Stock, only the V-8 vehicles must have an SFI bellhousing.

Or....all vehicles running 11.49 or quicker.
So the Focus could technically run under the F/S index of 11.80, but not by much. Or add weight and run G/S

Either way the Focus would need an SFI flywheel and clutch assembly as well as a SFI harmonic balancer ( unless it uses a "hub" )


Since the car has a transverse arrangement, this is the closest I could come to in the rule book:

All front-wheel-drive or transverse-mounted applications using a
clutch and running 11.49 or quicker, for which an SFI Spec 6.1,
6.2, or 6.3 flywheel shield is not commercially available, must
be equipped with a flywheel shield made of 1/4-inch minimum
thickness
steel plate. Shield must surround the bellhousing
completely
except for area of bellhousing adjacent to differential
and axle shaft. Shield may be multi-piece, with pieces bolted
together using minimum 3/8-inch-diameter Grade 5 or M10
class 8.8 bolts; may be attached to engine and/or bellhousing.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 12:56 PM   #18
FED 387
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,409
Likes: 504
Liked 329 Times in 177 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

somebody is building one otherwise they just "don't put cars" into the guide--Who??? maybe Ford???
FED 387 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 01:08 PM   #19
ALMACK
VIP Member
 
ALMACK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 129
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FED 387 View Post
somebody is building one otherwise they just "don't put cars" into the guide--Who??? maybe Ford???
I'd love to try it. But those are not cheap cars.

With some 116 octane fuel, more boost and an open exhaust I believe it could make the power easily enough.
Just getting the car equipped with all the legal stuff would be the key
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377
P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird
I/PS '95 Mustang GT
ALMACK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2018, 05:18 PM   #20
6130
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 409
Likes: 295
Liked 117 Times in 50 Posts
Default Re: Ford Focus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALMACK View Post
I would be curious how a racer will get around the SFI bellhousing rule with the transmission arrangement in that car
I apologize for going a little off-topic here, but for anyone considering running a manual transmission race car without a clutch can, whether the rules require it or not, I submit the following. Please learn from my error(s) in judgement:

Back in the '80s, I ran an NHRA Pro ET normally-aspirated rotary Mazda door car twice a week at two local drag strips. There was no commercially-available SFI Spec 6.1 bellhousing. There was also no SFI Spec 1.1 flywheels or clutches available.

The set-up that worked the best for me, was a stock cast iron flywheel, with a stock pressure plate, and a fairly lightweight clutch disc with a solid (unsprung) hub and no marcel spring between the facings. I experimented with various metallic pucks on the disc.

The NHRA rule book at that time said that solid-lifter manual transmission cars had to have a clutch can, and since the rotary has no lifters, I was able to get through tech without one, even though I was launching, shifting, and going through the lights at about 9,000 rpm.

Then in 1990, a flywheel/clutch explosion at the top end nearly cut the car in half.

It was an un-necessarily exciting ride, for a car that only went 111 mph or so. It sounded like a bomb going off inside the car. In addition to the concussion, the wind was suddenly whistling through the car, which was full of smoke and what I initially thought was flames (but turned out to only be sparks from severed battery cables). It blew the latch off for the front-hinged hood and blew the hood up momentarily, until the wind made it flop back down. It blew the brake master cylinder right off the firewall, so I had no brakes. I also had no engine compression braking, since it vaporized everything between the engine's rear main seal and the transmission's front bearing. It oiled down my slicks, which made steering kind of exciting, as my right hand wouldn't work (it had been resting on the shifter when the explosion happened, which stunned my right arm up to the elbow). Thank God I had routed my fuel line outside the front sub-frame stampings (for this exact reason), or I would have been on fire with absolutely no way to stop, with nothing but a single-layer 3-2A/1 jacket to protect me. I was afraid to look at my feet, because I thought I had lost them. Fortunately, the rotary engine is so small, that the entire clutch and flywheel are located forward of the firewall, so my feet were never in line with the shrapnel.

I will never make a mistake like that again.
6130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.