|
![]() |
#41 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Fife, Washington
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 2,466
Liked 2,939 Times in 707 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Pro Stock is dying and we, probably, can't stop it from happening. I have loved and followed the class closely from it's beginning. The early Pro Stock cars were fun to watch. The class had much appeal to racers and spectators alike. I just checked the stats and in 2008 there were 52 cars in the class and in 2016 there were 27. I believe that in the late 70's or early 80's there were about 15 Pro Stock cars in Division 6 alone. I hope the class can be fixed, but not going to hold my breath.
__________________
Ron McDowell - Did Race Every day is a Gift - Enjoy with family and friends. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Wingdale, NY
Posts: 302
Likes: 27
Liked 53 Times in 16 Posts
|
![]()
Not being mentioned here is the most obvious draw for the TV and Spectators..
Heads Up Racing no handicap racing on the "Outlaw Racing" shows, they have better ratings than NHRA Will Lamprecht |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 64
Liked 345 Times in 149 Posts
|
![]()
The Factory Stock Shootout is the modern day Pro Stock to me.
The current Pro Stock class will not grow as it sits. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
There's still the issue of money. If the current PS contigent(KB racing, Gray Motorsports, Elite, McGaha, etc) jumps into this class, we will be back to less than twenty cars in no time. Big money racing programs will likely keep the "little guy" home. 23 events will likely keep the "little guy" home. Do we really have 20 new racers willing to pour at least $500,000/yr in a racing program for multiple years with new investors backing them. When you think about the bigger issue in my mind, it's a popularity and a new money issue issue. How do we address the new money issue and convince that money to stay.
And if there is a move like this on the way, it would be wise to keep the current investors/racers involved so you have the best possible chance to keep that money as well. New investors haven't loyally invested millions for years so relying on new money alone is risky. Side note, it maybe time for NHRA to invest some money into joint education programs with high schools to build interest into racing earlier on. All major motorsports organizations should look into doing that. Plane that seed early.
__________________
Adriel Paradise, Paradise Racing Team Driver/Crew Chief(at least my dad claims me to be) B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas Last edited by cutta; 11-27-2016 at 04:20 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Likes: 102
Liked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
![]()
IMHO making this a big tire class with roll cages capable of 8.50 or quicker elapsed times basically obsoletes any existing FS car because it makes no sense whatsoever to back half and tear a perfectly good roll cage, etc, etc out of a 135,000 serial numbered factory hot rod.
To me it makes far more sense to just build another car if that's what NHRA should decide to do.
__________________
Mike Keener A/S B/S C/SM |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Detroit Mi, Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
If the big three want to sell cars then include a heads up bracket under the speed and et needed for a roolbar and race "taxes" I mean seat belts every two years.....
The big three should pay me for my ideas too. ♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠♠ Last edited by Jason Fuller; 11-27-2016 at 06:26 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 8
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
14x32 tire, steel body with carbon fiber front, Liberty 5 speed,must use OEM engine,have max cubic inch and minumum weight and let 'em have at it.
__________________
Nautilus Racing |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Miles From Nowhere
Posts: 7,815
Likes: 2,903
Liked 5,120 Times in 1,951 Posts
|
![]()
Sounds great on the surface, but you'll have weight breaks within four events.
__________________
"We are lucky we don't get as much Government as we pay for." Will Rogers |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 785
Likes: 45
Liked 316 Times in 67 Posts
|
![]()
In an unlimited class you will lose MoPar & Ford fairly quickly if they even try (see Pro Trucks and current PS)
Sheer numbers and Corp interest by Chev will always dominate unlimited Current FS at 9" allow all 3 entities to think they got a shot If the big 3 would pressure ($) NHRA to run when fans are in their seats instead of early AM and late sessions, their appeal would quickly become the real PS; too bad the suits can' t see what fans really want, heads up, cars that look like cars, and corp competition and less I forget the wheel stands |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Md.
Posts: 107
Likes: 11
Liked 44 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned pro stock truck. That class seemed to be growing but then the nhra pulled the plug on it. I could see the same thing happening with this. It's a shame but like so many have said, money rules. I couldn't afford to race in super stock until I was in my 40's there is no way a younger generation can or wants to afford the type of racing we do. My kids like the new cars, but it's a dream to them to even own one. Kids nowadays have their priorities in different places than us.
__________________
Tommy Baker SS/GA # 172 E/SA # 1272 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|