ET with and without wheelie.

[1320racer]

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

Too broad and vague a question to answer without making personal opinions from personal experiences and assumptions.

Absolutely NOT!

For the type of cars discussed in this forum, Stock/Super stock and their related bracket car counterparts, meaning small tire cars with stock/bolt on suspensions as well back halved cars, the FACT remains what you lose or gain in 60 foot directly effects the ET!

If you get to the 60 foot clocks slower and you WILL, breaking the beam with any part of the car behind the front tires no mind the back tires, you WILL run a slower ET!

Originally Posted by Billy Nees

I'm quite certain that the moderator is happy with all of the personal responses though.

He was when I spoke to him on Sunday

[outlaw]

[QUOTE=1320racer;704250]Absolutely NOT!

For the type of cars discussed in this forum, Stock/Super stock and their related bracket car counterparts, meaning small tire cars with stock/bolt on suspensions as well back halved cars, the FACT remains what you lose or gain in 60 foot directly effects the ET!

If you get to the 60 foot clocks slower and you WILL, breaking the beam with any part of the car behind the front tires no mind the back tires, you WILL run a slower ET!

Checked log back on one of the 60’ rear tire days. 1/8 mile track 1st pass 60’ with fronts 1.356 sixty 4.111 330 6.451 1/8 104.5 mph. Second pass 60’ with rears 1.495 sixty 4.109 330 6.450 1/8 104.8 mph. But a hillbilly shouldn’t be in a conversation with someone with an apparent IQ of 1000 so my last comment on this subject.
Terry

[1320racer]

you shouldn't!

[Stan Weiss]

Originally Posted by outlaw

Checked log back on one of the 60? rear tire days. 1/8 mile track 1st pass 60? with fronts 1.356 sixty 4.111 330 6.451 1/8 104.5 mph. Second pass 60? with rears 1.495 sixty 4.109 330 6.450 1/8 104.8 mph. But a hillbilly shouldn?t be in a conversation with someone with an apparent IQ of 1000 so my last comment on this subject.
Terry

Terry,
Thanks. Good information.


Stan

[1320racer]

bogus info that he thinks is valid

[Bob Sherwood]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

Absolutely NOT!

For the type of cars discussed in this forum, Stock/Super stock and their related bracket car counterparts, meaning small tire cars with stock/bolt on suspensions as well back halved cars, the FACT remains what you lose or gain in 60 foot directly effects the ET!

If you get to the 60 foot clocks slower and you WILL, breaking the beam with any part of the car behind the front tires no mind the back tires, you WILL run a slower ET!



He was when I spoke to him on Sunday

You are absolutely wrong on that statement - just because you have a slower 60' because you tripped the it with the back tires or anything else doesn't mean that you will be slower in the 330. the 330 will always tell you - 60' can vary depending what tripped the clock

[1320racer]

My time slips prove you are absolutely wrong.

[Signman]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

My time slips prove you are absolutely wrong.

your 330 numbers change to the negative when tripping the 60 with the back tires.
you've tested back to back same track conditions and weather.

[TOSTO RACING]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

My time slips prove you are absolutely wrong.

post em we all posted ours lets see this JESUS CHRIST SUPER STAR WANNA BE SUPER STOCKER !! This thing probably floats over the 60 foot timers as good as he THINKS he is!

[Bob Sherwood]

Originally Posted by 1320racer

My time slips prove you are absolutely wrong.

Well I have time slips to prove that you are wrong in your statement . My car will carry the front tires past the 60' quite often and always run as quick or quicker to the 330' even though the 60' will be slower. If the 60' had an imaginary vertical line that you crossed with the front tires above the 60' beam and you had a slower 60' time because the beam was broke by back tire , does not mean you will have a slower 330' time .