|
![]() |
#51 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,624
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Seriously, I see where Alan is coming from and I agree. If they would build stripper cars to entice the kids then technically that might help class racing more than a few paper cars to a select few individuals. On the other hand, little old ladies can't cry on the evening news about their 16 year old dead after street racing a stripped down hotrod they just bought him if ford doesn't build/sell them to the public. Paper cars designed for the track serves 2 purposes for the factories. 1) Gives racers new combo's (and the factories $$$) 2) No liabilities on the streets (I'm suing ford for selling me a car that will go 150mph or is stripped down with no airbags etc) I too would like to see v-6 and GT mustangs in the guide. (along with about a dozen other fords.....now it's "want to build a ford..here's your choice..mustang". That sucks)
__________________
Jim Miller 103 U/SA |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Surely you guys are just being funny. You don't really think it matters to anybody about the brand of a new bogus combo they have to race heads up, do you? Not everybody is so ate up with the name on the valve cover. Some of us have owned and raced cars from all three mfgrs.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I've been out of the game for quite sometime, But raced Hemi and Max-wedge cars in the late 60's till early 80's and I figured the Mustang was my ticket to take into retirement and race stock again. As it rturns out the only option we have is NMRA and that's just not my cup of tea.
Last edited by 201250; 06-30-2011 at 05:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bardstown, KY
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 131
Liked 369 Times in 127 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
However, it will be a heads-up class based on the Pure Street rules. It would be open to all 1979 and later Fords with the new 5.0 4v. The chassis rules are similar to Stock Eliminator. The 2011-2012 Mustang GTs are already allowed in Real Street.
__________________
Alan Mackin Stock 3777/ SS 3377 P/SA & SS/PA Fox Thunderbird I/PS '95 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houma, LA
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 2
Liked 325 Times in 50 Posts
|
![]()
Sure it matters if it is not a bowtie. Those guys got that thing burned into their forehead, and really can't stand it for another brand to go fast. 1968, dejavue again. Most of yall ain't old enough to have been through it back then. Some things don't change, and the bowtie thing is one.
__________________
Jeff Teuton 4022 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
Yeah, Jeff, I'm too young to remember. LOL. Had two Fords, an Olds and a '48 Plymouth with a Hemi in it before I ever owned a Chevy. Starting in '60. I'm as old as you. Remember?
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
The engine you have pictured there is NOT a paper engine. The dead give away is on the description tag. It clearly states it's a Laguna Package engine which means it's a BOSS 302 longblock.
FWIW The new 5.0L 4V GT engine is a Coyote. The BOSS 302 4V engine is a Roadrunner. Also the proposed NMRA class known as Coyote Stock (C/S) would be limited to a FRPP crate engine with the M-6017-A50XX control pack. No F.A.S.T., BS3 or DFI VII, or ANY kind of tuning in general. No blueprinting, no anything. Also the driveline would be restricted to diaphragm style clutches and street type boxes (Tremec). (Which I think is stupid, so many racers are sick of the NMRA's stance against Long clutches, but that's a gripe for another day). Suspension wise it would be stock type rear suspension, 26x10.5 tire, no coil overs or mini tubs. Tubular front replacement suspensions allowed. BTW Why doesn't the NHRA allow these types of front suspensions but will let you convert a Cobalt to RWD?? They are a direct bolt in replacement. That makes no damn sense. Anyway one last thing the only place this engine is legal in heads up is Factory stock nOT Real Street. It would dominate any other class other than H/S or SSO/Pro 10.5 (6-8 second classes) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
A Coyote crate engine on the other hand sells for $5899.00 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 221
Likes: 50
Liked 38 Times in 17 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
And yes the pricing on the Boss longblock has been raised significantly now. I paid $6133 back in February. Last edited by kdanner; 07-02-2011 at 11:41 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|