Divisional at Famoso - Page 7

bubski · 10-19-2022, 10:35 AM

Bubski says “ look at the bright side “ at least he didn’t go 10.50 in SS/JA after they let him in SS !!! Straight outta I/SA !!

Race Clean · 10-19-2022, 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mitch kight

The 62-67 383 had the 666, 301, intakes approved 16 years ago and everyone was running them. I was running the 666 on my car, someone complained about unfair advantage and NHRA banned both. Leaving one that will not work and is 30 hp down from the other two. Mr Hale took the fight to NHRA and out of it, the 6267 383 keeps the 301 but lost the 666. The 301 is faster on my car! I went to a 1968 car. I talked to the Gentleman that had the 1964 car in ISA and last time car was run. It was legal and they did not know of the rule change.

Do the 283 still get to use the 327 intake?

GTX JOHN · 10-19-2022, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTX JOHN

MY mistake = The 301 is legal at this time.
The 666 which possibly is a better intake maybe
is the one currently illegal on the 64 383.
I assume that was the problem.

The manifold rules have moved around a bit on this combo
and I am not current on it.

I believe that is basically about what I also said similar to what Mitch
said in Post 60. That is what got me in trouble.

Dave Muller · 10-19-2022, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Race Clean

Do the 283 still get to use the 327 intake?

How did I know this was going to come up???

Joe Schweigert · 10-19-2022, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Race Clean

Do the 283 still get to use the 327 intake?

Why not it's A chevy !

10-19-2022, 10:35 AM	#61
bubski Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 228 Likes: 14 Liked 165 Times in 60 Posts	Re: Divisional at Famoso Bubski says “ look at the bright side “ at least he didn’t go 10.50 in SS/JA after they let him in SS !!! Straight outta I/SA !!