|
![]() |
#71 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Nice logic. Now just sell that idea to the techman when you show up at a race with your car using the wrong strut rod bushings. Good luck.
BTW, I failed to see the disclaimer where just racers that actually drive are the only people allowed to post on this website. There are others interested in seeing Stock and S/S survive without actually strapping themselves in the drivers seat. They are the ones who build the engines, ones who build the chassis, ones who own the racecar, ones who own the tow rig, ones who sit in the stands, ones who tech the cars, ones who put on the fire safety equipment, ones who work the starting line, ones who sponsor the racing, and ones who teardown the engine when the driver does not know which end of the wrench to hold. That's right, there are a lot more people interested in seeing Stock and S/S continue to survive than you ever thought possible. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 Last edited by 69Cobra; 01-20-2013 at 12:47 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 77
Liked 32 Times in 9 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Mark Madison 7995 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 712
Liked 1,585 Times in 582 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
First, in addition to control deflection at high speeds and during braking, they must also rotate. Nevertheless, it is a no win situation. If a racer uses an OEM style bushing, they are too soft for racing; if you use a bushing with higher Durometer numbers or stiffer, then it limits the rotation of the bar and creates other issues including damage to the strut. As for NHRA's statement such as "any car will wander/hunt during hard braking with a narrow front tire"; that is a whole bunch of baloney and shows their lack of knowledge of the dynamics regarding the front suspension of a drag race car. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 14 Posts
|
![]()
Jason, if you have no dog in this hunt, take a hike.
The spherical bearings in question were allowed 10 years ago with no issues. Now out of nowhere, someone decided they didnt like what they saw. How do I know? WE GOT THEM OK'd in Vegas 2003. I would not call that stretching the rules. I was there when it was fine to use the stuff in question, and I was there when they didnt like what they saw on a mopar this past July. What I do know, is on a Ford, the way the replacement parts work, it does not allow the lower control arms to flex and will keep them in check, without damaging the frame horns of the suspension after an over violent wheelstand, repetitive wheelstands, or any braking. There is absolutely NO performance advantage to this stuff. It makes the car more stable at speed, and controlable when the car lands the front end. Period. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Well I asked if they could explain how this is a safety issue in SS but not Stock and here's the reply.
Quote:
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Spokane Valley, WA
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Still didnt answer your question, did he...?
__________________
Phil Hudlow 6678 (S/C, S/G, ET-PRO) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
So it is in writing that this modification to Stock frontend suspension parts was okayed 10 years ago? Not a problem. I'm sure showing that letter to the tech dept will put an end to all the controversy. Thanks for letting everyone know that you have the answer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California, Ky
Posts: 669
Likes: 61
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Since you are so smart and this is your fight can you tell me what NHRA's logic is for correcting a safety issue in one class but not the other when there is absolutely zero performance advantage here and like I said earlier some of these Stockers weight more and are faster than a comparable SS'r. Please tell me how that makes sense. Matter of fact if my info is correct and I understand it correctly there has already been an on track incident related to the rubber bushings in the front suspension on a Mopar that took out about 4 or 5 sections of guardrail out at Mason Dixon in 2007 at a division 1 race. In case you haven't noticed Jason there has been over 22,000 views on this topic. I think its important to 99% of Stock and SS racers for one reason or another. Now that SS racers are in the clear and not sh!ting their pants anymore as far as the ruling in their class we probably wont hear from them anymore on this. But I can promise you if NHRA wasn't passing this for SS there would be more people than me and the few others here wanting answers. You've got million dollar cars going down at 130mph with OEM rubber strut rod bushings. Make sense to you Jason?
__________________
Kris Rachford 69 Cobra 428CJ 4 Speed C/S 3032 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|