|
![]() |
#81 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I think you're probably right. Just another example of the gross mis-management that is NHRA, today.
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#82 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Can anyone explain or define our so- called mineshaft conditions and the rules for it to come into play.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#83 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,646
Likes: 1,941
Liked 10,745 Times in 2,235 Posts
|
![]()
with or without F/X cars?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#84 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Liked 28 Times in 15 Posts
|
![]()
In my experience - NHRA has never replied to receiving or granting Horsepower requests. The first year I requested reduction I waited for the Dec. list and - Nothing? No indication! When I called to check they said it must have been lost? Resubmit for next year. I did and in July again - Nothing. After calling again I received a call from Wesley - and he said they screwed up. He said they would look into it and 2 hours later returned my call and discussed my combination and gave me 15 HP off.
He was very helpful but I understand he no longer has that position? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#85 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Larry. Basing it on a normal division race and a standard national event.
If your question was replied to my question? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#86 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: rohnert park,ca
Posts: 414
Likes: 11
Liked 79 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
bob beals 7244 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#87 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Jim, the simple answer is
Must have at least 32 car field Split the field in two (example 32 divided by 2 equals 16) 17th qualifier has to be .85 under First car in the second half has to be .85 under after final qualifying run Hope this helps |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#88 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Ya I get that part thanks.
Guess my point is here you could take those 17 cars for example that have run .750 under at there best forever!!! Those 17 cars go into day 2 of qualifying with Mother Nature cooperating at her best an suddenly they all run .850 at there best they ever have. And the bottom line is they get penalized right? Or in NHRAs eyes they all should have dumped at a 1000'. THE RULE NEEDS TO BE TOSSED OUT PERIOD!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#89 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Jim,
If the weather conditions improve and still qualifying the .85 under hurts nobody unless you go 1.20 under for instant hit. The real problem is most racers play the ladder game, therefore the system is flawed. The big problem occurs when the conditions improve after final qualifying and you have a very fast car and trigger your combination ( you know the famous saying I didn't think I would go that fast) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#90 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Renton, Washington
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Correct. Sorry I didn't clarify that right. I was meaning running faster than the .850 under factor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|