|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I am new to the Stock Eliminator game, and wanted to ask a question. Is it better to find a car closer to the lower end of the NHRA factor, or the larger end. Would a car closer to 11.00 be better to start with than a car closer to 11.99, just as an example. Or does it not even matter. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anthem, Arizona
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
![]()
You can adjust the weight to the bottom (11.00 in your example) so it doesn't matter. FYI, NHRA allows you to move up or down one class from the "natural" class the vehicle falls in. In each case of movement, you are still allowed to go to the lightest end of the class.
__________________
Jeff Lee 7494 D/S '70 AMX |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Any way you cut it, you will spend more to go faster, just make sure to buy something you can afford, understand, and like to look at in the garage, or trailer. Your skill as a bracket racer and tuner, will have a lot more to do with your sucess than the speed of the car. Enjoy
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
Liked 502 Times in 130 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Jeff is right, it doesn't really matter.
__________________
Eric Merryfield 1883 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
So if I wanted to run O stock, it doesn't give me any advantage to find a car close to the 15.00 factor versus a car that might be near the bottom with a 15.99 factor. It can all be manipulated with weight, to make up for the differences. Can I assume this is correct? Thanks for all the replies so far.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
That helps alot. Thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Just because a car fits a class doesn't mean it can run the numbers for that class. You have to be careful to pick a good combo or a class with few cars. Check out the records and class winners. Or you can find an untried combo thats way underfactored and kick butt. Good luck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I am looking at a 1994 Mustang GT with an auto. Any thoughts on that, or possible other suggestions?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I don't think it fits your name of "Mopar Jeff"
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|