HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2010, 08:26 PM   #1
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default 4 wide is the answer

Why not run Class 4 wide and pay a bonus to win, the HP will then take care of itself or people will never win class.
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 08:45 PM   #2
Kenny Wigington
Senior Member
 
Kenny Wigington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cumming,Ga. USA
Posts: 967
Likes: 36
Liked 60 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Herb, thats good !
__________________
2894 STK
Kenny Wigington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 09:31 PM   #3
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Actually I was thinking about If they payed something for Number 1 qualifier. Then gave the number one car a pass as far as the afhs was concerned. You might see a lot more people trying to be number 1. And then the afhs could work better with the 2 through whatever cars.
Qualifying number 1 is a joke the way it stands now. You just get punished for a job well done.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 09:47 PM   #4
Ed Fernandez
Veteran Member
 
Ed Fernandez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NOO JOISEY nexta NOO YAWK
Posts: 5,879
Likes: 38
Liked 100 Times in 45 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by art leong View Post
Actually I was thinking about If they payed something for Number 1 qualifier. Then gave the number one car a pass as far as the afhs was concerned. You might see a lot more people trying to be number 1. And then the afhs could work better with the 2 through whatever cars.
Qualifying number 1 is a joke the way it stands now. You just get punished for a job well done.
Artie,the guys trying to protect their combo would just run the car hard enough to keep away from the trigger.There are the rogues (Fezell comes to mind) that don't seem to care
about the AHFS.But most of the guys into the long run wouldn't fall into that trap.
Just my opinion.
__________________
Former NHRA #1945
Former IHRA #1945
T/SA
Ed Fernandez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 09:55 PM   #5
art leong
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Fernandez View Post
Artie,the guys trying to protect their combo would just run the car hard enough to keep away from the trigger.There are the rogues (Fezell comes to mind) that don't seem to care
about the AHFS.But most of the guys into the long run wouldn't fall into that trap.
Just my opinion.
Eddie I was just bringing up the sad point that. You work hard on the car to make it run then you worry about going to fast. Myself included.
And people wonder why we are a dying breed.
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS
art leong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 07:30 AM   #6
Bobby DiDomenico
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 923
Likes: 101
Liked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Smile Re: 4 wide is the answer

[QUOTE=art leong;178497And people wonder why we are a dying breed.[/QUOTE]

Art, you mean 'cause we are getting older?
Bobby DiDomenico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 07:54 AM   #7
Mickey Whaley
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,220
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Smile Re: 4 wide is the answer

just run 3 wide put the new mustangs and challengers on the return road they can still win class as fast as they are with the f uped hp they got
Mickey Whaley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 10:05 AM   #8
Lee Valentine
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brookfield, CT
Posts: 708
Likes: 13
Liked 319 Times in 68 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Still want Bruton Smith to buy NHRA, watch what you wish for.
__________________
Lee Valentine 1661 STK
Lee Valentine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 11:37 AM   #9
herbjr
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 1
Liked 83 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

Its amazing how these two types of cars have made so many cars worthless. THe only answer to this is do away with heads up runs during eliminations.
herbjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2010, 12:31 PM   #10
Bryan Worner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 817
Likes: 130
Liked 477 Times in 79 Posts
Default Re: 4 wide is the answer

I think it would be cool to run class 4 wide! What would be wrong with that? Get class in quicker, less runs on your car and done for the day at the track earlier! I had 7 cars in class at Charlotte! That would have been two rounds instead of 4!! They didn't even get to run the final because of weather! So where's the draw back there???

The problem with a lot of you is you are too stubborn to accept change! I'm sure some of the pros bitched about it because they seemed to have problems staging! But I'm sure they were instructed on how to stage, and some were just too bone headed to pick it up! It was fairly simple if you ask me!

Why don't you ask some of our senior racers that may have raced 4 wide back in the day what they think?? Remember, this is not new. They did it at York and Budds Creek!

Bracket racing 4 wide........don't think you'll ever see that! But who knows.
Bryan Worner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.