HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock Tech
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2012, 08:10 PM   #1
Weekend Racer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: P.Q.
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default clevite rod bearing

The connecting rod bearing #CB 663-H are no more available. They replace by CB-663-HN. This bearing is 2 gram lighter , and more narrow .

Is there an issue with the crank balance ?
Do this bearing change oil pressure?

Thank!
Weekend Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 08:20 PM   #2
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Yes, you need to rebalance.

No, there is no loss in oil pressure.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 08:39 PM   #3
Weekend Racer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: P.Q.
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Thank! Mr.Roehrich , for your info!
Do you known where to find a new set of CB-663-H. ?
Weekend Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 09:00 PM   #4
Alan Roehrich
Veteran Member
 
Alan Roehrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 1,571
Liked 1,826 Times in 414 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekend Racer View Post
Thank! Mr.Roehrich , for your info!
Do you known where to find a new set of CB-663-H. ?
You probably won't. Those bearings were probably all sold out with new cranks in rotating assemblies. They have not made those bearings in at least 3-5 years.

I use King race bearings in almost all of my stuff, coated by H.M. Elliott, so I don't keep up with the Clevite stuff much anymore.
__________________
Alan Roehrich
212A G/S
Alan Roehrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 09:07 PM   #5
Weekend Racer
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: P.Q.
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

I will look to use my old one.

Thank you!
Weekend Racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 10:14 PM   #6
pmrphil
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: CT
Posts: 457
Likes: 1,802
Liked 347 Times in 151 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

I do have a limited supply if needed. Holler if you want.
__________________
Phil Molski
PMR Performance
S/C 1623
pmrphil is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 10:22 PM   #7
carl hinkson
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NORTHEAST
Posts: 287
Likes: 1
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekend Racer View Post
The connecting rod bearing #CB 663-H are no more available. They replace by CB-663-HN. This bearing is 2 gram lighter , and more narrow .

Is there an issue with the crank balance ?
Do this bearing change oil pressure?

Thank!
Being 2 grams which on my balance card would put you 4 grams over balance is not going to hurt a thing.

If you have the crank rebalanced onece its done and the bobo weights are removed have the machinist put the bob weights back on and see how close it is!!!

Like guys guess the oil weight how do they really know what to add for the weight of the oil ???
carl hinkson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 11:06 PM   #8
rustbucket79
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekend Racer View Post
The connecting rod bearing #CB 663-H are no more available. They replace by CB-663-HN. This bearing is 2 gram lighter , and more narrow .

Is there an issue with the crank balance ?
Do this bearing change oil pressure?

Thank!
FM makes race bearings that maintain the width with the large chamfer. 8-7100CH.
rustbucket79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 10:57 AM   #9
Reed Granrt
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Murfreesboro, Tn
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

Quote:
Originally Posted by carl hinkson View Post
Being 2 grams which on my balance card would put you 4 grams over balance is not going to hurt a thing.

If you have the crank rebalanced onece its done and the bobo weights are removed have the machinist put the bob weights back on and see how close it is!!!

Like guys guess the oil weight how do they really know what to add for the weight of the oil ???

Carl is correct. Crankshaft balancing is governed by the world wide standard of ISO1940 and if you plug in all the figures and do calculations based on a 1700 gram bob eight and 8000 rpm, the residual unbalance of -4 grams is under balanced (remember you are removing 2 grams per rod). The residual unbalance change is minuscule. The weight change is only .002 %. And as Carl said, remove the bob weight and re install and get your big surprise. You will be appalled at how many shops that do not re calibrate their machines on a timely basis. Many dont even center the bob weights on the rod journal except by visual and the same in placing the bobweight perpendicular to the rod throw. And get real surprised when you tell them you want to over balance the crank since you are going to drag race it. And even more so when the "machinist" over balances a circle track motor because it works on a drag car.
Do not worry about re balancing unless that is what you want to do
reed
Reed Granrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2012, 01:48 PM   #10
JRyan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aberdeen SD
Posts: 645
Likes: 30
Liked 112 Times in 31 Posts
Default Re: clevite rod bearing

I whole-heartedly agree with Carl & Reed that the two grams makes virtually no differnece. In fact, knats-*** balancing is highly overrated. For instance, you're in a circle track car turning left, do you balance the right side lighter than the left due to oil being thrown onto the right bank? Do you balance the rear lighter than the front due to loading the rear on acceleration? What about when you hit the brakes. In a
Formula 1 dry-sump world, pan efficiency might correct some of those issues, but in our world, we can only guess. Does your balance guy use one, two, or three percent overbalance? Does he really know what's correct 'cause the bearings might look good in all three cases?

Grumpy Jenkins used to put 70 gram heavier wrist pins in the race engines and put them on the dyno. When it came time to go racing, he put the light ones back in. If 70 grams per rod end weight didn't cause problems for the Grump, four grams per journal certainly won't. Don't worry about it.

Jerry
JRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.