|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario,canada
Posts: 440
Likes: 70
Liked 66 Times in 29 Posts
|
![]()
Austin Williams in seat,Is this a 427-425HP combo to run AA/SA??
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 963
Likes: 336
Liked 161 Times in 52 Posts
|
![]()
Yes.
__________________
Stephen Johnson #2162 Horace Johnson #2167 SS/D 427 Ford Fairlane NHRA-IHRA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 1,537
Liked 1,766 Times in 401 Posts
|
![]()
How did an 69 Chevelle 427/425 automatic make AA? The 69 Chevelle 427/425 automatic is a natural B car. We even asked if using aluminum heads to make the HP factor 435 would make it a natural A car with an automatic, and were told "no". The automatic has been a natural B car for as long as I can remember, back to when Harry Vineyard ran one back in the eighties and early nineties.Harry drove the car with an automatic in B/SA, and it was a killer. They put the 4 speed in and Tucker Parrish drove it in A/S, and it was just as wicked. I think Kevin Borgstrom put the 4 speed in his beautiful green Yenko clone just to run AA.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, Don`t stick & automatic fit the same class`s? stick 8.36, automatic 8.49.
__________________
Tom Moock 5704 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,614
Likes: 1,901
Liked 10,655 Times in 2,211 Posts
|
![]()
A= 8.00 lbs - 8.49 lbs per NHRA. A car can move up or down one class from natural class. So the car is a natural A car at 8.49 with the automatic. To fit AA/SA the car with driver would weigh 3355# min. to 3565# max.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hampden, MA
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 233
Liked 769 Times in 162 Posts
|
![]()
looks correct to me, by NHRA,s guide it's a natural A car , I did notice that Dwight's site lists the auto as falling at 8.50, and nhra says 8.49. not sure why they are different.
These cars have been run as A cars for ages, Denny Ford and Jim Benjamin both ran them as sticks back in the 70's and 80's , long before we could move a class up or down and I don't think the rating has changed
__________________
Dave Casey 1330 STK |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 158
Likes: 2
Liked 31 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
NHRA had originally rounded the 8.49*** to 8.50 which wasn't right.
__________________
Michael Brand II 505B - F/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,093
Likes: 1,537
Liked 1,766 Times in 401 Posts
|
![]()
The 8.49 has always been rounded to 8.50, and as recently as a year or so, when I looked, NHRA policy was anything over 0.25 pounds was rounded to 0.50 pounds for classification, as written in the rule book. I was looking at buying an already finished car a couple of years back, and NHRA told us in no uncertain terms that the 427/425 in the 69 Chevelle was 8.50 natural with the automatic, and we could not put the car in AA with an automatic.
By absolutely no means am I complaining, I actually hope that it is correct for the class. The 69 Chevelle is my chosen combination to be the companion car to the 69 Camaro Kevin Cradduck and I have campaigned since 2007. The only engine we couldn't share between cars is the ZL-1 we have. So, yeah, I'm hoping fervently that a cast iron head L-72 gets rounded DOWN to 8.00 instesd of up to 8.50, because I'd like to be able to run AA with either transmission. I'd much rather be able to run A or AA with both transmissions.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Donaldsonville, LA
Posts: 977
Likes: 17
Liked 227 Times in 69 Posts
|
![]()
They do not round up to half lbs. They round using the 3rd decimal point. If it was 8.494 it would be considered 8.49.
__________________
Jimmy "Cooter" Hidalgo, Jr. 4865 E/SA '04 GTO 4865 SS/GA '99 Firebird |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arkansas - In the middle of everything.
Posts: 1,999
Likes: 63
Liked 772 Times in 192 Posts
|
![]()
This is interesting. I have a copy of the Class Guide sheet for 1969 Chevrolet that I downloaded on 1/25/17 after the end of the year factors were added. It shows the factor to be 8.50, which is consistent with the math (3611 ship wt / 425 factor = 8.49647, rounds to 8.50). However, if you look at the same sheet on NHRA's website now, that factor is 8.49 with no indication that any change was made on the sheet. (Dates are included at the bottom of each sheet that documents changes.)
For anyone who is Excel knowledgeable, the formula for that cell was changed from (8.3*435/Q272) to (8.29*435/Q272), so a change was made. Here is the sheet from 1/25/17. Note the document date at the bottom is 1/1/17, the same as the current sheet on the NHRA website. Sounds like politics to me.
__________________
![]() Last edited by Dwight Southerland; 09-01-2019 at 07:56 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Liked |
![]() |
|
|