|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.
The interesting thing is that there was a guy there with a Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 (6 cyl) and he ran 13.4's and .5's all night. That's right chevy guys, a Chrysler 6 cylinder out ran the new Camaro! Just trying to stir things up, please no threats, mail bombs or IED's; if you decide to invade me, remember that Max the Wonder Dog will slobber all over you! Jim R
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 674
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]()
The main difference is that Chevy will sell a bazillion Camaros. Chrysler couldn't give the Crossfires away. SRT 6 is supercharged too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Bringing a '010 SS automatic coupe up to New England Dragway on Sat. to test (weather permitting). 1st track outing w/car.....so far he's done 3600 stall, headers, and e.f.i. live tuning. The only tire he could get ahold of for the rear brake clearance was a 20" Nitto drag radial....we'll see what this car does w/very low mileage, and stock except for what's mentioned....A little skeptical of the IRS and stock rear axles on this car, but have to start somewhere...
![]() Last edited by W J; 07-23-2009 at 07:22 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=treessavoy;131148]Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.
that is pathetic! i hope that the driver of the camaro really sucked, i took my 4300# 09 challenger 5.7 6speed and went 13.62 @ 104.00 bone stock!!!! i was told the camaro's only weigh 3600 with driver.it should be a lot quicker. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 160
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
|
![]()
my 09 challenger 5.7 auto went 13.59 with my wife at the wheel
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak 1231 E/SA 71 Demon Kelly MacKay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
[quote=jimi;131273]
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DRAGSTRIP
Posts: 886
Likes: 883
Liked 651 Times in 184 Posts
|
![]()
I've seen numerous 6spd 2010 camaro's run 13.0's some are running high 12's at 110 mph with good drivers bone stock.
__________________
5664 GHI/SA 1985 CAMARO RED H/SA 1985 CAMARO BLUE I/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the 3.2 SIX cyl is supercharged and put out 330hp and weighs 3220lbs, the Camaro is a fuel injected, multiple valve 425hp V8 and weighs about 400lbs more SO, you feel the 6cyl should be faster....not much faith in the camaro!
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
>>>"Camaro is a fuel injected, multiple valve 425hp"<<<
Multiple-valve??? You were expecting, maybe, ONE??? LOL! I have no clue what this ("multiple valve") means....
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Think how simple your valve train would be if you only had one valve....who cares about exhaust...?
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|