|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.
The interesting thing is that there was a guy there with a Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 (6 cyl) and he ran 13.4's and .5's all night. That's right chevy guys, a Chrysler 6 cylinder out ran the new Camaro! Just trying to stir things up, please no threats, mail bombs or IED's; if you decide to invade me, remember that Max the Wonder Dog will slobber all over you! Jim R
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: chicago
Posts: 654
Likes: 674
Liked 180 Times in 55 Posts
|
![]()
The main difference is that Chevy will sell a bazillion Camaros. Chrysler couldn't give the Crossfires away. SRT 6 is supercharged too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Paxton, Massachusetts
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Bringing a '010 SS automatic coupe up to New England Dragway on Sat. to test (weather permitting). 1st track outing w/car.....so far he's done 3600 stall, headers, and e.f.i. live tuning. The only tire he could get ahold of for the rear brake clearance was a 20" Nitto drag radial....we'll see what this car does w/very low mileage, and stock except for what's mentioned....A little skeptical of the IRS and stock rear axles on this car, but have to start somewhere...
![]() Last edited by W J; 07-23-2009 at 07:22 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, the 3.2 SIX cyl is supercharged and put out 330hp and weighs 3220lbs, the Camaro is a fuel injected, multiple valve 425hp V8 and weighs about 400lbs more SO, you feel the 6cyl should be faster....not much faith in the camaro!
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
>>>"Camaro is a fuel injected, multiple valve 425hp"<<<
Multiple-valve??? You were expecting, maybe, ONE??? LOL! I have no clue what this ("multiple valve") means....
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Think how simple your valve train would be if you only had one valve....who cares about exhaust...?
__________________
Jim Rountree |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Conway, AR
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I tried that, but it kept blowing head gaskets....
![]()
__________________
Bill |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]()
Think how simple your valve train would be if you only had one valve....who cares about exhaust...?
Well Jim, I've got just the thing for ya' to stuff in that Mopar. Getcha a blown 3-53 Detroit diesel. Transfer port(like a 2-stroke) on the intake and a conventional valve on the exhaust. Their unique sound earned them the nickname 'Yamaha'. Ken |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: usa
Posts: 239
Likes: 7
Liked 21 Times in 8 Posts
|
![]()
[QUOTE=treessavoy;131148]Took the PT Cruiser to test and tune at Gainesville and ran a new Camaro SS twice. Automatic car that ran 13.74 and 14.05 then he parked it.
that is pathetic! i hope that the driver of the camaro really sucked, i took my 4300# 09 challenger 5.7 6speed and went 13.62 @ 104.00 bone stock!!!! i was told the camaro's only weigh 3600 with driver.it should be a lot quicker. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: N.S. CANADA
Posts: 498
Likes: 160
Liked 68 Times in 41 Posts
|
![]()
my 09 challenger 5.7 auto went 13.59 with my wife at the wheel
__________________
1231 FS/D Drag Pak 1231 E/SA 71 Demon Kelly MacKay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|