|
![]() |
#13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,115
Likes: 1,572
Liked 1,829 Times in 414 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Actually, that's a bad idea. Why? Because NHRA does not consider the current local weather conditions at factored tracks, and adjust the factored index accordingly. I've seen days where the actual conditions at Denver, a factored track, were 1500' better than Bristol, an non factored track. A track that is factored at 3000' could see local current weather that was actually closer to 1900'. Since they don't adjust the factored indexes to account for that, it'd be ludicrous put HP on a car for running 1.25 under the factored index. If a car were to run 1.250 under the sea level index, then of course, it needs HP. But it already works that way now.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|