|
|
View Poll Results: Opinions on consolidating classes | |||
Combine Sticks and Automatics |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 14.73% |
Spread Weight Breaks (i.e., .5 for upper classes, .75 for some, then to 1.00 lb breaks) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
22 | 9.82% |
Both of the above |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
36 | 16.07% |
LEAVE IT ALONE! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
133 | 59.38% |
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,116
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,832 Times in 415 Posts
|
![]()
I disagree. Some engines simply work much better with a stick than they do an automatic. Some engines work well either way. Considering the wide variation of bore/stroke ratios, rod/stroke ratios, carburetor sizes, and cylinder head CSA's, just to name a few factors, to say that all engines work equally well with sticks and automatics is simply a generalization that cannot be true, nor can it be supported.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|