HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-18-2010, 12:12 AM   #1
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
Didn't I read that you have a 1998 LT1 car?
Yes.
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 07:50 AM   #2
GUMP
VIP Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 2,158
Liked 2,336 Times in 549 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dgal View Post
Yes.
So, guess which rule allowed your combination to be allowed! (I have two LT1 1998's)
GUMP is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 10:40 AM   #3
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUMP View Post
So, guess which rule allowed your combination to be allowed! (I have two LT1 1998's)
Gump,

I was waiting for you to post something like this. You are making this too easy. And instead of guessing, please state what rule was changed then and now. There wasn't a change then and even now there has not been a rule change. The NHRA is not adhering to the existing rules. Again, please do not infer. Be specific on the rule change.

I never claimed there was a rule change like dwydendorf did. I never asked that the Cobra Jets and Drag Paks be kicked out of stock just asked them to be classified properly like the LT1's were and the 1998 LT1 were already in the FIA class by the time they came out. So that kills any argument about a performance advantage of those cars period.

Are you suggesting that it is only a paper car? Well, that says you. There has been at least one other person besides myself that has laid eyes on one. I saw one on a used car lot in Ft. Worth about 5 years ago.

There were two things that caught my eye. One was that I like the way they look and two was that it was undervalued by about $2,000. I asked the dealer what was wrong with the car to reflect the price. He said that "no one wanted the car without the all aluminum engine." I had never seen or heard of an iron block LS1 so I asked him to raise the hood. I thought well I can see why no one wants it. It has the slower LT1 in it.

This was a low mileage original one owner car. I mentioned that I bet most didn't want it with the slower engine and that was why the kid that owned it was trying to sell it (consignment). He was tired of his buddies walking all over him with their LS1s.

I wasn't in racing at that time and had no clue what I was looking at. Knowing now I would have snatched it up and sat on it.

I started racing two years ago when my car was rated at 341 hp and now it is 346 hp. It is a fair car in the class and not the fastest when I bought it. I have worked and worked on it to get it faster. No amount of time or money will get my car to compete with factory race parts or power adders.

I still want to race the Drag Paks and Cobra Jets, but either factor them properly (immediately and at least get it close) or the easier solution is to put them in their own category.

Last edited by Dgal; 09-18-2010 at 10:49 AM.
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:03 PM   #4
dwydendorf
Member
 
dwydendorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 251
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dgal View Post
Gump,

I was waiting for you to post something like this. You are making this too easy. And instead of guessing, please state what rule was changed then and now. There wasn't a change then and even now there has not been a rule change. The NHRA is not adhering to the existing rules. Again, please do not infer. Be specific on the rule change.

I never claimed there was a rule change like dwydendorf did. I never asked that the Cobra Jets and Drag Paks be kicked out of stock just asked them to be classified properly like the LT1's were and the 1998 LT1 were already in the FIA class by the time they came out. So that kills any argument about a performance advantage of those cars period.

Are you suggesting that it is only a paper car? Well, that says you. There has been at least one other person besides myself that has laid eyes on one. I saw one on a used car lot in Ft. Worth about 5 years ago.

There were two things that caught my eye. One was that I like the way they look and two was that it was undervalued by about $2,000. I asked the dealer what was wrong with the car to reflect the price. He said that "no one wanted the car without the all aluminum engine." I had never seen or heard of an iron block LS1 so I asked him to raise the hood. I thought well I can see why no one wants it. It has the slower LT1 in it.

This was a low mileage original one owner car. I mentioned that I bet most didn't want it with the slower engine and that was why the kid that owned it was trying to sell it (consignment). He was tired of his buddies walking all over him with their LS1s.

I wasn't in racing at that time and had no clue what I was looking at. Knowing now I would have snatched it up and sat on it.

I started racing two years ago when my car was rated at 341 hp and now it is 346 hp. It is a fair car in the class and not the fastest when I bought it. I have worked and worked on it to get it faster. No amount of time or money will get my car to compete with factory race parts or power adders.

I still want to race the Drag Paks and Cobra Jets, but either factor them properly (immediately and at least get it close) or the easier solution is to put them in their own category.
It took 12 years for your horsepower to get where it is today (recent horsepower on your combo is dated 1-1-10) but yet you want NHRA to immediately refactor the CJ"s and drag pak cars. Well guess what, I started racing 40 years ago, and there have been combinations that have outrun my combo by a bunch ever since then. It is a part of this game, like it or not it will allways be there. Either get used to it, build one of the new cars, or go do something else because it will always be there. The system cannot react as fast as someone can come with a new killer combo. Its is not fair that the same rule that allowed your car to run stock, also allowed the CJ's and Drag Pak cars.lol If you find a copy of the 1996 rule book you will find that the paragraph about the 50 car rule is not listed.
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird

Last edited by dwydendorf; 09-18-2010 at 12:42 PM.
dwydendorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 12:11 PM   #5
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwydendorf View Post
It took 12 years for your horsepower to get where it is today (recent horsepower on your combo is dated 1-1-10) but yet you want NHRA to immediately refactor the CJ"s and drag pak cars. Well guess what, I started racing 40 years ago, and there have been combinations that have outrun my combo by a bunch ever since then. It is a part of this game, like it or not it will allways be there. Either get used to it, build one of the new cars, or go do something else because it will always be there. The system cannot react as fast as someone can come with a new killer combo. Its is not fair that the same rule that allowed your car to run stock, also allowed the CJ's and Drag Pak cars.lol
I am not even going to ask it. You are dense! It took 12 years? Where were the LT1s for all but the first 3 years??? They were in their own class to get the horsepower adjusted! Exactly what I and others have been asking for this entire time. And it is even in the post that you quoted me on.

How long have the Cobra Jets been out? We are working on three years. Why should they be treated any differently than the LT1s that you keep referring to? Heck you have an example of how to handle it. Just as the rule book states, prior approvals do constitute a precedent (I am paraphrasing).

Which means they don't have to put them in a separate class, but it makes the most sense like the did with the FI cars.
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 01:49 PM   #6
Ed Wright
Veteran Member
 
Ed Wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwydendorf View Post
It took 12 years for your horsepower to get where it is today (recent horsepower on your combo is dated 1-1-10) but yet you want NHRA to immediately refactor the CJ"s and drag pak cars. Well guess what, I started racing 40 years ago, and there have been combinations that have outrun my combo by a bunch ever since then. It is a part of this game, like it or not it will allways be there. Either get used to it, build one of the new cars, or go do something else because it will always be there. The system cannot react as fast as someone can come with a new killer combo. Its is not fair that the same rule that allowed your car to run stock, also allowed the CJ's and Drag Pak cars.lol If you find a copy of the 1996 rule book you will find that the paragraph about the 50 car rule is not listed.
They weren't over 100 hp soft going in either.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA
Ed Wright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 02:06 PM   #7
junior barns
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 541
Likes: 11
Liked 20 Times in 14 Posts
Thumbs down Re: Lack of integrity

As I said in a previous post, 12 years, 75hp!

The new cars are 100hp short to begin with. Does this mean it will take the NHRA 25 years to get them in line????
junior barns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 02:52 PM   #8
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by junior barns View Post
As I said in a previous post, 12 years, 75hp!

The new cars are 100hp short to begin with. Does this mean it will take the NHRA 25 years to get them in line????
You were correct then and you are correct now. Plus you have to note that the vast majority of the time for the horsepower adjustments were done in the FI classes (which is still active in IHRA).

25 years sounds about right, but it is ongoing as long as they keep making up new crate motors at Ford, Chrysler, and/or GM. Come on, 12.7 to 1 compression ratio for the 5.7 Drag Pak! What computer controls are in existence that can run that car on the street with pump gas?

What am I thinking. I forgot about diesel.
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 02:47 PM   #9
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Lack of integrity

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwydendorf View Post
If you find a copy of the 1996 rule book you will find that the paragraph about the 50 car rule is not listed.
This is a change from your last post that I quoted. How is this supporting your argument?
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.