|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 56
Liked 461 Times in 111 Posts
|
![]()
I've used a Jerico for 6 years with no problems.
__________________
68 Chevy11 327 F/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: TN
Posts: 530
Likes: 413
Liked 241 Times in 81 Posts
|
![]()
I still have the Narrow gear Jerico I bought in 1988. I couldn't begin to tell you how many runs it has on it. It has never let me down.
__________________
Rod Greene Real men shift for them selves. Slowly working on TA Challenger for D,E/S and a 72 Challenger for SS/K, L as if I don't have enough other projects. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: from Vancouver BC Canada, now in Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 292
Liked 1,052 Times in 287 Posts
|
![]()
Scott, what type of S/S combo are you considering? Like Bob & Rod, I have been very happy with my Jerico DR4`s, obviously my 302 Mustang M/Stocker doesn`t abuse a trans like a heavier high HP combo, but I also have a Jerico in my 3100 lb bracket car, that runs 10.0`s at 132mph, and has 60 footed in the high 1.2`s, and in the 8 years since I switched from an automatic to the Jerico, I have yet to have broken anything in the trans.Of course an overly agressive clutch setup would be much harder on parts than the modern low pressure sintered iron clutches that most racers use these days.
__________________
NHRA 6390 STK M/S 85 Mustang |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|