HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2009, 10:16 PM   #1
larrylomascolo
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Ontario,canada
Posts: 440
Likes: 70
Liked 66 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

in 1970 you could go to the dealer and buy a 426 hemi challenger, ins.and plates away you go,now these new cars ,the drag pak chall.cannot be street driven and is not avalible after a certain quota,has been met.dodge had the factory race car in s/s,the lightened front end car with the hemi ,it just looks to modified to run as a stock elim. car.some will agree and disagree,
larrylomascolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 07:45 AM   #2
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Cool Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

I personally believe that BOTH the Supercharged Mustang and the new Challengers belong in S/S or thier own class....NOT in stock eliminator. The rule book should be revised to say a larger number (min 100 and documented) should be produced and avaliable to the general public to who anyone who can afford them and want one. They dont have to be street legal due to all of the Govt. BS thats required to pass EPA and safety regulations today but no special runs of such small amounts produced. My 1 cent worth
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 08:59 AM   #3
lstanford
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 312
Likes: 1
Liked 134 Times in 32 Posts
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

It is what it is. Ford is going to kick some ***.
lstanford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:53 AM   #4
denny harvey
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: pataskala ohio
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

I think they should be in SS along with the new z-r1 vette,ford has done a great job of putting the mustang in the right peoples hands that can make them fly,mopar i dont know..
denny harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:56 AM   #5
Don Kennedy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Portland TN
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3,876
Liked 902 Times in 237 Posts
Talking Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

All of you all comments sound exactely like the comments that were said when the older cars came out long time ago. are you all sure you all were not saying the same things many years ago when the hemis and fords came out then LOL at us
__________________
Don Kennedy 7701 SS
Don Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:57 AM   #6
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,638
Likes: 1,929
Liked 10,702 Times in 2,228 Posts
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

Let them all RACE, just to keep the field leval.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 11:33 AM   #7
Smitty
Member
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

Ok, one car has yet to face an older one in the same class in competion yet and the other hasn't even seen the track and you guys are bitching. Damn, the fastest car doesn't always win. If stock eliminator consisted of all AA/SA(S) and A/SA(S) cars I might see the problem here but they don't so the guys will have to put a number on the window and run the dial in and hit the tree period!
Are you gonna bitch everytime someone brings a new combo to the table? Look over in SS, Bobby Dennis is the master of finding the odd ball GM engines and making them dominate. He is vey fast but against his index he's killer and a threat to qualify number one anywhere, yet he isn;t winning all the races. He did a real good job last year and thats because he works hard at it.
I really need to know what's the big deal? Chrysler built the Hemi back in the 60's as a purpose built SS car and you couldn't drive it on the street. There were to versions, the street and race just like Ford.
Quit your whining and race, it's not the end of the world.
Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 11:35 AM   #8
Smitty
Member
 
Smitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gibsonton, FL
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Unhappy Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

Oh, I know why everyone is upset, it's because Chevrolet didn't build and come out with a purpose built race car and Ford and Chrysler did. The worlds coming to an end because someone beat GM to the punch. Waaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!
Smitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2009, 11:44 PM   #9
treessavoy
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty View Post
Ok, one car has yet to face an older one in the same class in competion yet and the other hasn't even seen the track and you guys are bitching. Damn, the fastest car doesn't always win. If stock eliminator consisted of all AA/SA(S) and A/SA(S) cars I might see the problem here but they don't so the guys will have to put a number on the window and run the dial in and hit the tree period!
Are you gonna bitch everytime someone brings a new combo to the table? Look over in SS, Bobby Dennis is the master of finding the odd ball GM engines and making them dominate. He is vey fast but against his index he's killer and a threat to qualify number one anywhere, yet he isn;t winning all the races. He did a real good job last year and thats because he works hard at it.
I really need to know what's the big deal? Chrysler built the Hemi back in the 60's as a purpose built SS car and you couldn't drive it on the street. There were to versions, the street and race just like Ford.
Quit your whining and race, it's not the end of the world.

Excuse me but the 1964 and 1965 Hemi cars were built with complete street equipment and could and were street driven, the 1964 427 fairlanes were the same. The 1968 Hemi cars were NOT streetable and thus went into SS, not Stock.
treessavoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2009, 09:52 AM   #10
Sean Haning
Member
 
Sean Haning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jacksonville Fl.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Sean Haning
Default Re: Spy shots - Don Garlits Challenger

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
I personally believe that BOTH the Supercharged Mustang and the new Challengers belong in S/S or thier own class....NOT in stock eliminator. The rule book should be revised to say a larger number (min 100 and documented) should be produced and avaliable to the general public to who anyone who can afford them and want one. They dont have to be street legal due to all of the Govt. BS thats required to pass EPA and safety regulations today but no special runs of such small amounts produced. My 1 cent worth
I too would like to see these cars in the S/S class and let the other showroom cars battle out in stock. Now I wasn't around back in the day but how do these cars differ in their classification from the 68 HEMI A body cars? Aren't both factory built as race cars with no intentions of them being street legal? I mean I understand the 41 year difference between the two. Now before some hot head jumps on that question with sarcasm, I'm asking out of lack of knowledge.
__________________
Hired gun w/o gun.
Sean Haning is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.