New rules for 2010?

[Sean Kennedy]

Originally Posted by Phillip marvetz

So Sean, now who's paranoid? Don't worry little buddy by the time you have enough money to go racing again you'll be to old to cut a light anyway. And why the hell would you run F if you can't even make the lower end of G weight? Maybe you need to put those good heads back on............

Thanks for being so complimentary Phil.....

Ed and Phil, you guys need to learn how to use the QUOTE function.

It looked like there were going to be more G and H cars, so I can F. I'm so far down the latter it's not like it makes a difference whether I run .1 under or .30 under. So mathematical odds of getting a heads up would be less.

It turned out not to really matter, there were 2 cars faster than me in all three classes. But none the less, basic math Phil. The less cars in your class the less chance of a heads up.

The 'good' heads were not legal. As in blatantly not legal. The person who Steve Kelly had rebuild the motor did some grinding in the ports..... So they are junk for stock eliminator. The car ran good with them, we went .6 under with that setup, so believe me I'd love to use them.

[Phillip marvetz]

Ed and Phil, you guys need to learn how to use the QUOTE function.

You got me there little fella

[Sean Kennedy]

Originally Posted by Phillip marvetz

Ed and Phil, you guys need to learn how to use the QUOTE function.

You got me there little fella

Check your PM's, bud.

[X-TECH MAN]

Going back to using class winners ONLY and inspect each one in teardown (let the GOOD tech guys do their jobs) for the eliminator would cure all this BS of shutting off at 1000 ft. It would also make the AHFS system work like it should especially if the trigger was brought down to .8 under. Get rid of that farthest under qualifyer and a lot of the bogus and high dollar stuff will start to go away. Thats the way it was done for years until the slow guys whined. If you didnt win class you got to watch on Sunday.

[randy wilson]

it does not matter if they raise the index 2 seconds or lower it 5 seconds, it is still just a bracket race. and if you run someone in your exact class, and run 3 seconds under or 5 seconds over the car with the power wins. i love superstock, but it has lost the mystique. we have no real fan base like they had in the 70s.

[Jim Bailey]

Gump, I don't have a problem with any of the new cars. As long as the car can be purchased at the dealer, titled, and legally driven home. Then and only then should the car be eligible to be factored and compete as a Stocker. Stevie Wonder can tell the difference between a Drag Pac Challenger and a Showroom Challenger, or a New Showroom Mustang and a New Cobra Jet. I'm talking about "Purpose Built Factory Racecars". They are Superstockers.. period.. end. If you're gonna let them in stock, give them their own class or limit them to AA. I'll take my lumps (already have) and hope that the AHFS works, but wait for the whinning when the New Challenger starts showing up with the other "approved" engine combos and it infiltrates the lower classes....JB

[Bob Pagano]

Jim is right on they are SS cars. The drag pak cars have the rear moved up 1/2 inch just like the showroom cars,,,,,,NOT, so they must be SS not to mention the intakes and alum oil pans OH I said not to mention that. Stock my a..