|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Bub, The old rule books used to say the Super Modified classes were for 67 and newer cars. There were some real minor differences between the 66 and 67 Chevy II, such as the steering column and some dash pieces, some hidden, some not. I saw a couple of people tossed for having a 66. A lot of people did it, some were caught, some were not. There is no real meaningful difference, competition wise, between the 66 and 67 Chevy II. There were just a lot more 66's than there were 67's. The "cheating" joke about running a 66 Chevy II as a 67 was just something that went around when Modified was still around. I figured you'd heard it before. The guys I was working with back then ran a 67 Camaro as a 68.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Under-performing on the street: 409/425 chevy's, Street Hemi's, any of the Shelby Mustangs built after '68 and almost any multi-carb motor...tune them for the strip and they were the hot cars to have.
Most disappointing street or strip combination's were the boss 429 and the ZL1....iron head 427's regularly out performed them on the strip. JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dayton, MD
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
And yes, I am familar with the narrower dash and the colapsable steering column differences on the 66/67 Chevy II
__________________
Bub Whitaker |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
|
![]()
Jim R,
Your right on the Shelby. The 1968 GT-350, came through with a 302-4V/250HP. Totally useless. They should have utilized the 289/306HP for one more year. And those 1969 Ford Torino GT's with the 390/320HP didn't scare anybody either. Problem with the early Boss 429's, monster connecting rods, hydraulic cam and weak valve springs. Don't think that engine saw the north side of 5000 RPM's. PC |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Billings Mt
Posts: 282
Likes: 186
Liked 54 Times in 18 Posts
|
![]()
409/425s were turds from the factory because Chevy built them with 2 head gaskets on them to drop the compression. Removing one really brought them to life. That wasnt very well known at the time though or even now..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]()
The one we bought not only had two head gaskets, but was missing the inner valve springs. It had the rear cam bearing in wrong from the factory, and had been replaced, so it sat in a dealership for 10 years or so, and then in a dealership mechanic's basement for 5-6 more.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boise, Id
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
1980 Corvette with the 180HP low compression California 305. Mid 17's out of the box, even with the 4 BBL. Can't imagine forking out the $$$ for one of those. Good thing that was the only year GM did that.
Ditto on the 454SS truck. My friend's '72 Surburban with a slightly (and I mean slightly) modded 427 annihilated one. Wasn't even funny.
__________________
Rich Hedden 6011 BF/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boise, Id
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Wait, forgot one. Any of the Iron Duke Camaro's. Poor Camaro........
__________________
Rich Hedden 6011 BF/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,118
Likes: 1,573
Liked 1,837 Times in 417 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The guys I worked with bailed on Modified when it was merged into Super Stock, so that's not the era I was talking about. Again, they raced a 67 Camaro as a 68 (changed the doors, tail lights, and back up lights), so the rule was no real concern to us. I just remember guys who did race the Chevy II's joking among themselves about "cheating", and I remember a couple of cars being tossed as 66's. That rule probably was not in effect when you ran your Chevy II, or I may remember it wrong. Maybe Travis, Dave, or Terry will correct me.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 06-09-2010 at 05:32 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|