|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cambridge, ON
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Out side of the implemented year limit, what other rule changes were made after Nov. 71? Why do we consider this date as the end of Jr Stock?
Its great to read the comments from the guys that were there. Thanks for posting. Doug |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The stock classes were really STOCK with DOT tires (not the new sticky DOT type tires), OEM exhaust manifolds, a year limit (1960 and newer) No blueprinted cams, etc. and in the beginning the top class (A/S) was 9 lbs per HP instead of 8 lbs per HP. Last edited by X-TECH MAN; 07-03-2010 at 07:55 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dunnellon,FL
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
I think that traditionally Junior Stock meant the cars from the '50's to include the 55-59 chevys, 58-60 pontiacs, etc.
The end of Junior stock came with the big block cars of the early '60's. 1961 cars under 389ci's were JS, once the over 400ci motors hit the market and the factories got involved the days of JS were over. Just my opinion but if you brought back JR racing today all you would see would be 55-57 chevies, JimR
__________________
Jim Rountree |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|