|
![]() |
#141 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]()
Although it is an Oldsmobile engine, it is a Cadillac application specific only. It was not available on any other GM models. The engine is the same version and specs of the carburated Oldsmobile version for the applicable years,. However, the Cadillac version has a Throttle Body with the injectors on the intake runners.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#142 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Holland, PA Mooresville,NC
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 239
Liked 16 Times in 11 Posts
|
![]()
Dean Roberts the ZL cars and vettes were not in stock till they restarted AA, the old rule was 500 mim production
__________________
Bob Pagano A/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#143 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
Certified for what? You cannot license them for street use. You could get tags (license plates) for a ZL1 Camaro, a Thunderbolt, a Shelby, or any number of other cars. You cannot get tags for a new DP Challenger. You cannot get tags for a new crate motor Mustang. A DP Challenger isn't even a complete car, and Chrysler doesn't even have a street legal Challenger in the guide at that weight. You can bring up the ZL-1 all you want, but those cars could be driven home from the dealer, and legally tagged for street use. They were assembled, complete, with all street equipment, ready to drive, when you bought them. You don't see them because there were 69 built, 36 survive, and they're worth about $500K each. How many crate motor 352 or 428 Mustangs do you see on the street, legally, with tags? NONE. How many of the Drag Pack Challengers do you see, on the street, legally, with tags? NONE. And they're only a year or two old, not 40 year old priceless collectible cars. Drag Packs aren't even produced, you can't even drive them. Hell, at least the old Ford cars, even the ones built at Dearborn Steel Tubing, or what ever place Ford contracted to build them, came complete and able to move under their own power. You can't even buy one of the crate motor cars running and driving. That's a major change from how Stock Eliminator once was. Like I said, we now have cars in Stock Eliminator that the factory not only never assembled, but they have engines that were never even available in a complete car, period. We have cars that were never even built in the guide at weights they were never sold at. I suppose anything goes.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#144 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,105
Likes: 1,564
Liked 1,789 Times in 408 Posts
|
![]()
Everyone seems to be real quick to say "well, the AHFS will level everything out, eventually".
How long is eventually? You do realize that now that the rules are wide open, and the OEM's do not have to even actually build anything, cars or engines, that they can now just release a new "engine", comprised of whatever they and the aftermarket have in the parts bin, and a new "car", every time one of their current paper cars is factored even close to reasonable? They only thing they have to worry about is how big a check written to NHRA it'll take to get the next one into the guide. With the new open rules, they can produce new killers at will, they don't even have to put anything together, they just have to get a different pile of parts approved. So they can make their own killers obsolete any time they choose, and play the "one up" game until everyone in the class quits, out of frustration or lack of funds. They've opened Pandora's Box right in the middle of sportsman drag racing, and most people seem to be too blind to see the endless possibilities of things they can do now. It's all cool, some think, because they're on the "up side" right now. Will it all still be so cool when you can't afford the next new $100K piece, and your near new car is worth less than 50% of what you have in it? Good luck with that. The old adage "Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it" couldn't be more appropriate than it is here.
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#145 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 712
Liked 1,577 Times in 581 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As I understand, the OEM's submit the specs for approval and it is up to NHRA to accept them and racers have also submitted official documents and get them accepted or rejected without paying a fee. If you are talking about giveaways such as official vehicles, all the OEM's, including GM has done so. In addition, the OEM's, like aftermarket manufacturers an sponsors, they also pay for their advertisements. The Crux and reality of the issue is that NHRA accepted the horsepower factors that were submitted by the OEM's. I believe that even if the horsepower factors at the start of the induction of the CJ's and DP's were high, racers still would have purchased and raced these cars. Again, I keep asking and nobody has responded to my question if GM had a Supercharged version of the Camaro or 'Vette in the books and available, if the dynamics of these discussions would be the same. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#146 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Alan, I am not defending NHRA, however, I am curious too know how many are saying that the OEM's are paying NHRA to approve these cars?
In the end noting is FREE there is always somekind of pay back when you ask for favors |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#147 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 83
Liked 444 Times in 145 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Bruce Noland 1788 STK |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
Guys, I agree with what you're saying, but just so you know the new DPs & CJs CAN be licensed with some creative paprerwork. As long as you have an MSO, you COULD title them, but it'd be tricky.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#149 | |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 162
Likes: 251
Liked 19 Times in 7 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
ss/gt 93 t-bird Last edited by dwydendorf; 09-17-2010 at 01:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#150 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
![]() Quote:
Acid ported heads and intakes Superceded carbs
__________________
Art Leong 2095 SS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|