HOME FORUM RULES CONTACT
     
   
   

Go Back   CLASS RACER FORUM > Class Racer Forums > Stock and Super Stock
Register Photo Gallery FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2010, 02:03 PM   #1
Larry Hill
Live Reporter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,650
Likes: 1,942
Liked 10,767 Times in 2,238 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Tommy, a friend of mine, Stewart Beckham, said hello.

You are correct my old Cuda never was fast, all of the class trophies must have come from yard sales.
__________________
IHM Used Parts
https://ihmusedparts.com
888-821-1817

Last edited by Larry Hill; 10-05-2010 at 03:14 PM.
Larry Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 02:39 PM   #2
Glenn Person
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Regina, Canada
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Tommy
I assume Bobby, Jimmy and Joe rarely post on the internet because they are working dilligently to stay on top of their game and stay competetive. Since you say you have not heard from any racers in the top of their class I felt compelled to reply .As you know, over the years I have tried to be fast and was occasionally rewarded with a record or three. Now you arn't really so callious to think these aforementioned front running racers and their" traditional" cars deserve to be rendered non competetive in heads up competetion by the new combos. All we accomplish by this is to force these beautiful old muscle cars away from racing and ultimately reduce car counts. This is not good for NHRA or stk/ss. I don't believe any real racer wants this kind of scenario, but only wishes a fair chance to win with his or her chosen ride. For some, "going with confidence" is not currently possible. I am confident NHRA want to reduce this disparity, and is working at this as we speak.
Hope to see you and your dad this fall
GP
__________________
Glenn Person 5356 STK
Glenn Person is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 02:46 PM   #3
Peter Ash
Member
 
Peter Ash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 262
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wink Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Maybe the nhra should have hired a 10 year old with a computer to sort this out before it happenned?

Can we all agree now that those with the knowledge do not have the power to deal with this, and those with the power, apparently do not have the knowledge to deal with this!

How could there possibly be wool over the eyes of those blaming the factories? I do not for one microsecond believe that anybody in their right mind could have overlooked the hp ratings submitted to the sanctioning body!!!

Last edited by Peter Ash; 10-05-2010 at 02:51 PM.
Peter Ash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 03:12 PM   #4
X-TECH MAN
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
Thumbs up Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter ash View Post
maybe the nhra should have hired a 10 year old with a computer to sort this out before it happenned?

Can we all agree now that those with the knowledge do not have the power to deal with this, and those with the power, apparently do not have the knowledge to deal with this!

How could there possibly be wool over the eyes of those blaming the factories? I do not for one microsecond believe that anybody in their right mind could have overlooked the hp ratings submitted to the sanctioning body!!!
x 2
X-TECH MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 07:57 PM   #5
BPotts
Junior Member
 
BPotts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 84
Likes: 32
Liked 14 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-TECH MAN View Post
x 2
X3

I don't remeber all the details, but when the GM fuel injectected cars came on the scene did they go directly into the "fuel Injected" classes to sort themselves out or did they originally go into the regular stock classes? Now, knowing that they did put them in their own classes for a while to sort out the HP ratings, why didn't the DP and the CJ do the same thing?
BPotts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 09:11 PM   #6
K Stubbs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Benton, Arkansas
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by BPotts View Post
X3

I don't remeber all the details, but when the GM fuel injectected cars came on the scene did they go directly into the "fuel Injected" classes to sort themselves out or did they originally go into the regular stock classes? Now, knowing that they did put them in their own classes for a while to sort out the HP ratings, why didn't the DP and the CJ do the same thing?
There wasnt any fuel injected classes when they were first raced and it caused the same kind of problems. The new cars outrunning the old (most), until they were factored several times.
K Stubbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 08:38 PM   #7
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
Talking Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ash View Post
Maybe the nhra should have hired a 10 year old with a computer to sort this out before it happenned?

Can we all agree now that those with the knowledge do not have the power to deal with this, and those with the power, apparently do not have the knowledge to deal with this!

How could there possibly be wool over the eyes of those blaming the factories? I do not for one microsecond believe that anybody in their right mind could have overlooked the hp ratings submitted to the sanctioning body!!!
I think that an old drunk with a "Big Chief" tablet and one of those big first grade pencils could do it too!!
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 09:16 PM   #8
Dgal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Cimarolli View Post
I think that an old drunk with a "Big Chief" tablet and one of those big first grade pencils could do it too!!
What makes you think this isn't what happened?


Don
Dgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 09:34 PM   #9
Jim Cimarolli
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sulphur Springs Texas
Posts: 743
Likes: 146
Liked 166 Times in 46 Posts
Smile Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

What I am saying is that a guy like that COULD have gotten it right if they cared to do so.
Jim Cimarolli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2010, 09:41 PM   #10
5343 STOCK
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: MINNESOTA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Consensus By Professional Engine Builders

I'm not a big Internet poster, but I watched my wife get outran 1st rd of Indy 2010 by approximately 6 tenths and 9 mph by a dragpak challenger in G/SA heads-up.

Good experience to say the least. I would put our cars up against any "real car" , and I think we'd have at least a shot.

As a participant for many years, I feel the worst for the upper class cars which have been virtually made useless by the new breed of cars. Think about the tens of thousands of dollars spent to make the old muscle run as good as they are able too, quite impressive, I believe.

I hope NHRA does the right thing and makes the playing field level for all involved. Stock Eliminator should be based on enguinity and work, not solely on Hp factors.
5343 STOCK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright Class Racer.com. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.