|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Murfreesboro TN
Posts: 5,104
Likes: 1,560
Liked 1,784 Times in 407 Posts
|
![]()
There are no new Camaro combinations that are worth building for Stock Eliminator. Most of the new Corvettes are factored such that they are Super Stock only combinations.
You can buy a new stripper Cobalt for about $12K or so, used examples for far less. It is small, light, and aerodynamic. You can buy a Camaro body in white for about $10K or so. You need another $5K or so worth of stuff just to have enough pieces to start a Super Stock legal car. The Camaro is big, heavy, and not terribly aerodynamic. If you're going to spend $75K to build a Super stock car, where are you going to start?
__________________
Alan Roehrich 212A G/S |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sand Springs, OK
Posts: 8,132
Likes: 896
Liked 390 Times in 170 Posts
|
![]()
I can't imagine anybody building a new Camaro.
__________________
Ed Wright 4156 SS/JA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake Tapps, Washington
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Ed is right, it's hard to imagine anybody building a new Camaro but the real problem is with the shipping weight. Even if you could look past the "fat chick" Corvette look from the rear and the massive size (the Challenger is big too); the thing is a tank! Unless Chevrolet builds a special car with a sensible (or bogus depending on your predication) shipping weight (i.e. Firebird Formula) there is really no class to shoot for, especially one at the top of the heap. Without factory help the Camaro is more like a turkey than a race car. It's sad, I'd really like to see them out there doing battle with a "racing weight" shipping # and a soft HP factor, just like Ford and Mopar; it puts excitement back into our sport which is something most of us have NOT done for a long time. Just my opinion. TT
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
I'm with X-tech on this, they are really homely but in my neck of the woods they are not out selling the Mustang or the Challenger. Thank god. The WWII veterans say their nose looks like a german half track in the rear view mirror. GM had a chance and dropped the ball. But thats just my opinion and I've owned a Camaro since 1969 so I'm not a hater of Camaros.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
![]()
Just curious you know one of those mustangs will run in the 8s eventually in stock,if i was Chevy i would wanna do this first.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Richmond Hill GA (and Port Ludlow WA)
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 2,364
Liked 3,165 Times in 969 Posts
|
![]()
Not evident they care. If they can sell well Chevy will just rely on everybody just remembering when they were fast. GM flat missed the boat on this one. I've tried for months to let their looks grow on me but no use apparently; they're plain butt ugly. Rest assured though, we will see several at the track this year, probably S/G or T/S.
__________________
Jim Carter 2340 Super Stock 2340 SST/2340 Stock Set another place at the table |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Lake Placid, Florida
Posts: 3,203
Likes: 1,047
Liked 235 Times in 110 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|