Ed F.,
What do you call it when you fail to answer simple. direct, sometimes yes-or-no question that relates to the thread subject?
Cowardice? That would be good for a start.
Obfuscation?
Nope'; too many syllabiles for your "superior," Joisey edumucation...
Rudeness?
Nope that isn't even in your limited vocabulary...
Ignorance? Yep... now, we/re getting somewhere!!!
Psyco-babble that is ego-driven?
Maybe, but it's got more facets than that...
Just plain don't know the answer, and trying desperately to defray attention from that faact, , so that maybe, just MAYBE, no one will notice!!!
The burning question, one last time:
How is a rule that treats 2 competitors differently a fair one?
Competitor 1 gets red light jeopardy EVERY time he faces the tree when running a quicker car.
Competitor 2 only faces it when his compettiton in the slower car, goes green.
Tell me, Ed F., what is the reason that anyone could think that's equal treatment under the rules? And, if it's equal not treatment (it's not) what makes it "fair" and not worthy of changing.
I don't expect you to answer this because, that's what you do; you write pages of insults and "cute" put-downs in hopes that no one will notice that you couldn't/wouldn't answer the question, BECAUSE to answer it, would reveal that you have NEVER had a real understanding of the problem at hand.
You're position is intellectually bankrupt.
Now, prove me wrong and answer the 2-part question. Please...
05-03-2011, 11:36 PM
Re: worst red light debate, again!
Threaded Mode