|
|
![]() |
#1 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
![]()
I thought it was the quickest 128 cars.
-Toby |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
|
![]()
Toby, it is, since 2008. Winning Class, no matter how many cars are in it, does not get you in the show. Sad.
__________________
Mike Carr, Tri-State S/SS Association President Looking for 2015 S/SS Race Sponsors Contact me if interested buffdaddy_1302@hotmail.com (724) 510-5912 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duncannon, PA
Posts: 825
Likes: 136
Liked 535 Times in 86 Posts
|
![]()
Since there are no singles in class anymore, maybe they should change this rule back! The combo winners should be in the field! Take that idea to your competition rep!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Live Reporter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hickory, Ky
Posts: 10,662
Likes: 1,953
Liked 10,820 Times in 2,249 Posts
|
![]()
Hey Travis,
Is this true? Have the rules changed? The way it reads it's class winners + qualifiers??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 281
Likes: 2
Liked 11 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
It's read the same for years, even after the rule changes. It misleading - maybe all the non-qualifying class winners since the rule change should file a class-action suit for the false advertising (j/k)!
__________________
Tim Kish 3032 SS/GS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 371
Liked 129 Times in 59 Posts
|
![]()
The point may be moot - as of this evening there were 132 entries in Stock Eliminator for a 180 entry quota, 73.3%. Entries close on Monday at noon, so as of now only 4 people go home to make a 128 fastest field, hopefully NOT one of the Class Winners!
Lew
__________________
Lew Silverman #2070 "The Wagon Master" N/SA |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Egg Harbor Township, NJ
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,453
Liked 4,377 Times in 502 Posts
|
![]()
Definitely.. no reason not to change it back now
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|