|
![]() |
#17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NS CANADA
Posts: 892
Likes: 1,631
Liked 393 Times in 153 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
As long as the rules benefit gm (drag or stockcar or anything else) the "majority" of racers are happy. As soon as the vaunted chevy is unseated all hell breaks loose. I do remember all the pissing and moaning about hemi's this and that until they got their own class...and then THAT was an issue because mopar was being "favoured". There are too many tangents with this argument and they all continually get mashed together which then turns into a fordbash/moparbash/new carbash/etc. Nitro can tell us exactly how many heads up runs between new/old if he wants as well as who won/lost. So, is the bogus factors the issue? or, factories building the cars? or, rich people "buying" a perceived winning racecar? or, ahfs is too slow? or, time shouldn't march on? or, I'm pissy cause I haven't won a race in forever? or,......... Like was mentioned before, what did the flathead guys say when the sbc showed up? What did the "hotrodders" who did ALL their work in their own garage say when a brand new 409 rolled up to the line? Or a hemi, or a thunderbolt or whatever. My point is, there has been REMARKABLE advances in a short period of time, many times. It sucks to be on the losing side. Personally, are the hp too soft on some newer stuff? It would appear to me, yes. Is there a mechanism in place to rectify it? Yes. Will it be instant or as quick as some would like? no. Hell, pick any turbo car and tell me you can't blast the index by turning up the pressure! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|