|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
We could go so far as no knife edging on the crank, stock lifter size, stock cam diameter, and stock firing order, and steel pans only. All could be checked with an access hole in the pan.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
Only Stick? Auto with Brake? No handicap? Line loc okay.what did they cost?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
No, automatics are ok with me, but you would absolutely have to give the 2 speed a weight brake. Not so concerned with the 3 speed high dollar autos, but in this situation, a 2 speed will be at a disadvantage to a clutch. Line locs fine with me.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
PG cars got 100 lb lighter car in Modified before didnt they? or was it more?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
WEIGHT Cars with fully automatic transmissions with converter may remove up to 5 percent or 250 pounds, whichever is less, from regular class weight; may be under posted minimum weight. Cars weighed with driver; minimum weight includes driver. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
But I think that's rated against a clutchless now, am I right?
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
VIP Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Richmond Indiana
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 5
Liked 32 Times in 19 Posts
|
![]()
With all the support here and good ideas they are varied levels of motor cost and complexity. Should a poll be taken of most important factors for the cars? Cost, simplicity by sealing them, claimer heads ok, etc?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
Dick, my vote has got to be claimer heads, with a $500 exchange. It's simple, and logical. Also, it doesn't take hard work out of the equation. Sealed, or claimer motors destroys all that. Also, heads is what keeps most out of comp. They change designs seems like weekly. Also, I think it's important to keep the visual performance parts to a minimal, as we've discussed. I think a spec tire, fuel, and possibly rear gear, as long as it's entertaining. I love the fact that brodix evened up the competition, to where no one can bitch. Also, things I've brought up would keep valve train cost affordable.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
VIP Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 3,047
Likes: 712
Liked 1,606 Times in 584 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
http://www.brodix.com/heads/spec.php Then: no Titanium valves, no external oil pump, no sheet metal intake only cast intake, one single 750 CFM carb, no crank trigger, no external vacuum pump, any compression, limit tire width to 11.5", 358 CID max engine. Must maintain OEM cylinder bore spacing, OEM engine deck height and engine block must have a OEM part number. I think this would maintain an even competition and keep costs down for the class. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
![]()
I agree, but that would put cars in SS\AS. I have no problem with any of this, but I'm only one person.
__________________
don,t have one |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|